Octavia AI 價格VIA

OKX suspends DEX aggregator service due to detection of North Korean Lazarus attack Crypto exchange OKX announced via X that it is temporarily suspending its decentralized exchange (DEX) aggregator service and making significant updates to its security system. This comes after…

The institutions are coming to Token Terminal 👇 @RobinhoodApp via USDG @krakenfx via Ink @coinbase via Base @PayPal via PYUSD @BlackRock via BUIDL @FTDA_US via FOBXX

The Aave DAO has spoken: there will be no new token. The decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) reached a consensus that there is no significant interest in launching a new asset, despite discussions on how a new token could potentially accelerate revenue growth through liquidity bootstrapping. Stani Kulechov, founder of Aave, shared the update in a post on X, making it clear: the team respects the DAO’s decision and will not push forward any initiative that lacks strong community backing. “Overall consensus across the Aave DAO is that there is no interest in other tokens,” Kulechov wrote . The concerns were clear. Analyst Mika Honkasalo raised the issue that AAVE holders might expect future earnings from any new product associated with Aave. He likened the situation to a company issuing new equity for a separate product – a move that can confuse investors about the true value. Kulechov clarified that the proposed Horizon token is not an Aave initiative. Instead, it is a separate project by Avara, which aims to acquire a tech license to use Aave’s infrastructure for part of its business. He acknowledged that there was a gap in expectations but reassured the community that Aave’s focus remains on growing its ecosystem while respecting DAO governance. Related: Aave (AAVE) Price Prediction 2024-2030: Will AAVE Price Hit $500 Soon? While the rejection of a new token is final, Aave remains committed to exploring Real-World Assets (RWAs) as a revenue stream. Kulechov stressed that RWAs are an important area of growth for Aave DAO. As a result, the team will refine its approach based on community feedback. The goal is to find the right way to integrate RWAs into the Aave ecosystem without compromising decentralization or governance principles. Kulechov’s statement highlights that AAVE remains the primary governance and utility token of the ecosystem. “There is only AAVE,” he stated, stressing that the protocol will continue to focus on strengthening its existing token rather than diversifying into new assets. Related: Aave Chain Initiative Founder Faults MakerDAO’s Proposed $1B Allocation Via Morpho Labs This decision reinforces Aave’s commitment to decentralized governance and ensures that any future developments align with the community’s long-term vision. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

To avoid potential conflicts of interest, Crypto Czar David Sacks, an advisor to President Donald Trump, has liquidated more than $200 million in digital-asset holdings. The move follows mounting criticism over his financial ties to the crypto sector and his advocacy for a bitcoin strategic reserve. Sacks has faced scrutiny on social media and from U.S. lawmakers, including the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, due to his involvement in the digital-asset space. A memo released by the White House now reveals that Sacks and his venture firm, Craft Ventures, moved to minimize any potential conflicts. The timing is notable: the memorandum was released a day before Senator Elizabeth Warren’s March 6 letter, demanding that he confirm he no longer owns any digital assets, following his claim on X that he sold all his crypto. Related: World Liberty Financial: $550M Raised, SEI Purchase, and an Unusual Token Swap Offer Warren wrote, “Despite your public statements via X, it remains unclear exactly when you personally divested from BTC, ETH, and SOL, when Craft Ventures divested from Bitwise, and whether people close to you ‘may have held positions and sold into the recent price surge.” Key divestments made by Sacks and Craft Ventures include: Related: U.S. Senate Committee OKs Stablecoin Bill, Balancing State & Federal Roles Altogether, Sacks and Craft Ventures have divested over $200 million in digital-asset holdings, with at least $85 million directly attributed to Sacks himself. The divestments came at a significant tax cost, as special government employees, like Sacks, are not entitled to certificates of divestiture . Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Is the competition in the crypto industry pushing Ledger to attack Trezor, or is it a timely warning for all users? Behind this revelation lies a major issue: the security of wallets. Ledger has demonstrated that Trezor’s Safe 3 and Safe 5 models had a critical flaw. A simple workaround of the firmware potentially allowed access to users’ funds. How was this breach discovered and corrected? Ledger Donjon, the cybersecurity research branch of Ledger, discovered a critical vulnerability in Trezor’s wallets Safe 3 and Safe 5. While studying the security of these models, researchers found that cryptographic operations were performed on a microcontroller vulnerable to advanced attacks. The problem? A hacker could theoretically modify the firmware and bypass the integrity check, making unauthorized access to users’ digital assets possible. “We believe that strengthening the crypto ecosystem benefits everyone “, stated Charles Guillemet, CTO of Ledger. A discovery raising questions about the robustness of competing wallets. Trezor responded promptly by applying a patch, demonstrating its commitment to security. But this incident highlights a troubling reality: security flaws are not just anomalies, but ongoing threats. If a breach has been patched today, how many more remain to be discovered in the world of crypto wallets? Hardware wallets are supposed to be the ultimate vault for digital assets, but this incident shows that none are infallible. Trezor introduced Secure Elements, chips designed to protect private keys against physical attacks. However, Ledger revealed that this protection could be bypassed via the microcontroller, rendering the flaw exploitable. Facing the threat, Trezor recalled that its firmware has an integrity check to prevent any malicious modifications. But Ledger demonstrated that this protection could be bypassed by a determined attacker. A simple physical access could compromise a crypto wallet, a worrying situation for altcoin and bitcoin investors. Some notable figures: If traders and holders of digital assets thought that their wallet was impregnable, this incident reminds them that caution is necessary. In the world of digital assets, cybersecurity is a never-ending battle. Trezor and Ledger strive to improve the protection of their wallets, but hackers continue to refine their techniques. Every innovation brings its share of vulnerabilities, turning security into a game of cat and mouse. The latest flaw highlights an underestimated risk: physical attacks via the supply chain. In theory, a malicious actor could compromise a crypto wallet even before it’s purchased by a user, thus opening a sneaky breach in the protection of digital assets. Ledger emphasizes the importance of Secure Elements and firmware integrity checks to prevent unauthorized access. Yet, even with these measures, threats are constantly evolving. As Trezor stated: In cybersecurity, the golden rule is simple: nothing is infallible. A statement that resonates as attack methods become increasingly sophisticated. Some concerning elements: How far will manufacturers have to go to secure crypto wallets? Should we expect new flaws or innovations capable of eradicating these risks? One thing is certain, the crypto industry must redouble its vigilance, as attackers, themselves, never sleep. This flaw reminds us that the security of wallets does not solely rely on technology, but also on the vigilance of users. Ledger itself has been a victim of phishing campaigns and data leaks in the past. Nothing is ever completely secure in the crypto universe, and staying alert remains the best protection.