ราคา LooksRareLOOKS

Thailand is making waves 🌊 in the crypto world, embracing digital assets with innovation, regulations, and rising adoption. Let’s explore what’s trending in the Land of Smiles 😊✨! --- 📈 Crypto Adoption is Booming 🚀 Thailand is going all-in on crypto! 🎰 As of 2023, 13 million Thais (about 18% of the population) are holding digital assets 💎📱. The crypto fever took off during the pandemic 😷, and it hasn’t slowed down! ⏩💨 --- 🏛️ Government & Crypto: A Strong Partnership 🤝 Thailand isn’t just riding the wave 🌊—the government is actively supporting the crypto industry! ⚖️🏛️ 🔹 Tax-Free Trading 💰❌ – No taxes on crypto trades, helping investors keep more profits! 🤑 🔹 Bitcoin ETFs 📊 – Soon, you might be able to invest in Bitcoin ETFs directly from Thai exchanges! 🔥📉 🔹 CBDC (Digital Baht) 💴 – Thailand is testing a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) to modernize payments! ⚡💳 --- 🌍 Thailand’s Crypto Hotspots 🏝️✨ 🚀 Phuket’s Bitcoin Paradise 🏖️ – A pilot project is in the works to make Phuket a Bitcoin-friendly destination! 🌟 Tourists could pay for hotels, food, and activities in crypto! 💳➡️₿ 💎 Luxury for Crypto 🏠💎 – Fancy buying a villa, supercar, or even a yacht in Thailand using Bitcoin? It’s already happening! 🚗⛵🏡 --- 🚨 Challenges & Risks ⚠️ Despite the excitement, there are challenges to tackle: ❌ Crypto Scams & Fraud 💀 – Authorities are cracking down on scam operations in the region! 🚔🔍 ⚠️ Crypto Addiction 📉😵 – Some people are getting addicted to high-risk trading, and Thailand now has rehab centers for crypto traders! 🏥🔄 --- 🎯 What’s Next for Crypto in Thailand? 🇹🇭 Thailand is proving itself as one of Asia’s crypto leaders! 🏆 With a strong community, government backing, and innovative projects, the future of digital assets here looks brighter than ever! ☀️🚀 💬 Will Thailand become a global crypto hub? Let’s see what the future holds! ⏳🔮d #Write2Earn #bitcoin #Web3

Here's the Analysis of $LUMIA : LUMIA going below the listing prices, formed a small sideways market, between the $0.37 - $0.38. Price doesn't looks good enough for buys as no clean support or major support in the left. Wait for a good closing and shorts can be taken.

Managing the economy in times of war is an art. And Emmanuel Macron, who is preparing for any Russian eventuality, must juggle finances to strengthen military spending without scaring the French. He has stated: no question of raising taxes. But where to find the necessary billions? Between new savings products, targeted taxation, and European contributions, the State is exploring several avenues. Meanwhile, Moscow shows no signs of slowing down, and Europe wonders if it is ready to face the future. France is on the brink of financial bankruptcy ? Emmanuel Macron is not alarmed about this issue for the moment. His priorities are now on the war alongside Ukraine against Putin. Thus, to finance military expenses, his government is considering original solutions. The Livret A, already used for social housing, could host a new mission: defense. An idea that divides. “I do not want my money to be used to finance the war,” declares a skeptical architect . Others, like a retired Parisian, are ready to play the game: “We all have to participate.” But to mobilize the French, they still need to be convinced. Philippe Crevel, an economist, reminds us that “the saver looks at the return above all.” So, will a special defense product come into being, with an attractive rate? Meanwhile, the Minister of the Economy, Eric Lombard, mentions a contribution from the wealthiest . A heavier tax on “those who have substantial savings” is on the table. But how far will this taxation go? France, already plagued by a deficit of 6.2% of GDP , can it afford a capital flight? Some figures to remember: With these colossal amounts, the question persists: can France rearm without sacrificing other parts of its economy? In the face of an increasingly worried Europe, Emmanuel Macron advocates for raising military spending to over 3% of GDP. Some even mention a shift to 5% if the United States decides to disengage from the security of the Old Continent. “We will have to go higher,” recently declared the French president. But how to finance such ambition? The idea of taxing multinationals is excluded. The government prefers to close some tax loopholes and attract private investors to a defense fund. But will banks and insurance companies follow suit? A meeting is scheduled for this month to convince them to inject capital into the arms industry. Meanwhile, Europe is trying to harmonize its efforts. Ursula von der Leyen proposes a new mechanism allowing EU countries to access massive loans for defense. But between proponents of a European strategy and those who rely on NATO, consensus is far from being reached. Germany and Poland look towards Washington, while France advocates for European military autonomy. What do we prefer: an American umbrella or a strengthened European army? Moscow is not idle. According to the latest report from the International Institute for Strategic Studies, Russia now dedicates 6.7% of its GDP to defense, amounting to 145.9 billion dollars. When adjusted for purchasing power parity, this is equivalent to 461.6 billion dollars, more than the combined military spending of all European countries. The Russian war effort does not stop there. Its military industry is operating at full speed, reactivating old factories and mobilizing the private sector to make up for huge losses in equipment. “We are not prepared for what awaits us in four or five years,” warned Mark Rutte, NATO Secretary General. For their part, Europeans are increasing their defense budgets, but is that enough? Estonia, Poland, and Germany are ordering tanks and fighter jets in droves. France hopes that its arms industry will benefit from this momentum, rather than see contracts go to South Korea or the United States. Is the risk of a direct confrontation between Europe and Russia real? In any case, the rhetoric is heating up. Already, the Russian foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, warns: “An EU military contingent in Ukraine would mean a direct war with Russia.” And while some talk of negotiations, others already see a darker horizon. For two years, many have announced the imminent collapse of the Russian economy. Yet, it holds firm, despite increasingly heavy sanctions. But a severe blow hit last December: Ukraine cut off Russian gas, depriving Moscow of an essential economic pillar . So, is Russia as robust as it claims? The future will tell us.

Holy shit Just noticed that $SPX500 looks like it will fall of cliff at anytime Who will save us ? 😰😰

Michael Saylor to President Trump's Crypto Czar David Sacks: "You do not sell your Bitcoin." 🇺🇸 Michael Saylor, the co-founder, and former CEO of MicroStrategy, is a well-known advocate for Bitcoin. His company, MicroStrategy, has become one of the largest institutional holders of Bitcoin, and Saylor himself has been a vocal proponent of Bitcoin as a store of value and a hedge against inflation. On the other hand, David Sacks, a prominent entrepreneur and investor, was appointed by President Donald Trump as a part of his advisory group on cryptocurrency, known as the "Crypto Czar" team. Saylor’s statement, “You do not sell your Bitcoin,” to David Sacks, speaks volumes about the underlying philosophy and strategic approach toward Bitcoin as a long-term asset. Why Michael Saylor's Statement is Important: 1. Belief in Bitcoin as a Store of Value - Michael Saylor firmly believes that Bitcoin is not just a digital currency, but a store of value that can protect wealth over time, especially against the risks of inflation, currency devaluation, and geopolitical instability. His view is rooted in the idea that Bitcoin’s limited supply (only 21 million coins) and decentralized nature make it a much more reliable asset in the long run compared to traditional fiat currencies and even gold. - Saylor’s advice to David Sacks is based on his conviction that once you own Bitcoin, it's better to hold it for the long term rather than selling it. The rationale is that selling Bitcoin, especially during a market dip, is a short-term mindset that misses the broader opportunity for long-term wealth accumulation. Bitcoin has historically shown significant growth over extended periods, and Saylor’s strategy involves holding through market fluctuations and reaping the rewards over time. 2. Bitcoin’s Role in Diversification: - MicroStrategy's aggressive acquisition strategy has been to convert its cash reserves into Bitcoin. By doing this, Saylor sees the company building a hedge against the erosion of wealth caused by inflationary policies, such as the expansionary monetary policies pursued by central banks around the world (e.g., the Federal Reserve). - Saylor often emphasizes the need to have Bitcoin as a core part of one's asset portfolio because it acts as a hedge against the dilution of purchasing power caused by the overproduction of fiat currency. His recommendation for David Sacks is rooted in the idea that Bitcoin is part of a sound, diversified investment strategy that protects against inflation. 3. Long-Term Thinking and the "Diamond Hands" Mentality: - Saylor’s call to not sell Bitcoin is also a reflection of the "diamond hands" mentality that has become popular in the crypto community. This mentality refers to holding onto your investments, no matter the volatility, and resisting the urge to sell during market corrections or downturns. The idea is to trust the long-term potential of Bitcoin and not react impulsively to short-term price swings. - For a person like David Sacks, who is involved in the business world and has a broader understanding of technology and investments, Saylor is essentially advising him to align his strategy with the long-term view of Bitcoin’s value, rather than selling during volatile moments. 4. Bitcoin as a Digital Asset and the Future of Finance: - Michael Saylor’s statement can also be seen in the context of the broader discussion about the future of digital assets and blockchain technology. Bitcoin is becoming increasingly accepted as a legitimate asset class by institutional investors, businesses, and even governments. For Saylor, the long-term future of Bitcoin looks very promising, especially as more people and entities continue to recognize its value. - By advising not to sell Bitcoin, Saylor is also urging others to acknowledge the changing dynamics of global finance, where traditional financial systems may be disrupted by decentralized technologies. Holding Bitcoin is a way to participate in this disruption and benefit from the evolution of the financial system. Bitcoin's Role in Global Economic Systems: The conversation between Michael Saylor and David Sacks also touches on the broader global economic system. Bitcoin is often referred to as "digital gold," a new form of money that exists outside the traditional financial systems, meaning it isn’t subject to government manipulation or inflationary monetary policies. Saylor’s advice suggests that Bitcoin can be a safe-haven asset in a world where traditional assets like bonds, stocks, and even gold are increasingly affected by the policies of central banks. Bitcoin's Impact on the U.S. and Global Economy: In the U.S., where the Federal Reserve’s monetary policies have resulted in significant increases in the money supply, Bitcoin is seen by some as a way to shield wealth from the consequences of such inflationary actions. By encouraging people like David Sacks to hold their Bitcoin, Saylor is advocating for a more widespread acceptance of Bitcoin as a safeguard against economic instability. Potential Risk of Selling Bitcoin: The essence of Saylor’s message is rooted in the risk of selling Bitcoin prematurely, especially given its long-term potential. Those who sell Bitcoin in the short term might miss out on future gains, as Bitcoin has historically shown significant growth over the years, despite market corrections. Saylor believes that if people hold onto their Bitcoin for the long haul, they will eventually see substantial returns on their investment. Conclusion: Michael Saylor’s advice to David Sacks is emblematic of a broader, long-term view of Bitcoin. In Saylor’s eyes, Bitcoin is a financial asset that shouldn’t be treated like a volatile commodity to be bought and sold on short-term whims. Rather, it’s a store of value that can protect wealth and provide financial security in the face of inflationary risks. By telling Sacks, “You do not sell your Bitcoin,” Saylor is offering a guiding principle that has driven his own success with Bitcoin investments. His belief in Bitcoin as a revolutionary asset class shapes his strategy of holding and accumulating, rather than selling. In a world where many traditional assets are subject to inflation, devaluation, and market manipulation, Bitcoin presents an opportunity for individuals and institutions to protect their wealth and be part of a financial system that transcends the limitations of traditional banking systems. This advice also highlights the shift in perspective within the financial world, where Bitcoin is increasingly seen not just as a speculative investment, but as a legitimate and critical component of a diversified, future-proof financial strategy.