CruxDecussata priceX

Big things are happening in the AI x Web3 space, and Sender_Ai is leading the charge! $ASI staking at 32% APY? That’s wild. The future is looking bright! 🌟💡 #ASI #SenderLabs #Crypto

🚨 @Tether_to x Republic of Guinea! 🚨 Tether signs an MoU to drive digital transformation & economic growth in Guinea through blockchain technology! 💡🌍 Will this set the stage for broader crypto adoption in Africa? 🤔 🔥 #Tether #Blockchain #CryptoAdoption #Guinea

$GOAT 10x ready 😍😍

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will fire 15,000 employees next week, right in the middle of tax season, according to a report from AP. The mass termination is happening under Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (D.O.G.E.), a temporary agency created by executive order to cut federal jobs and slash government spending. The layoffs come after the Trump administration ordered all federal agencies to terminate probationary employees who haven’t secured civil service protection. It’s unclear if more IRS workers will be affected, but sources say the cuts are happening fast. IRS blocks tax season workers from taking buyouts The administration had already launched a “deferred resignation program” designed to push federal employees out with buyout offers. The deadline to apply was February 6, and workers who accepted will keep getting paid until September 30—even after leaving their jobs. But for IRS employees working on the 2025 tax season, the buyout was off-limits. The agency sent a letter telling them they must stay until the April 15 tax filing deadline before they could leave. The IRS started processing tax returns on January 27 and expects to handle over 140 million filings before the cutoff. The agency had been on track to expand operations after receiving $80 billion through Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. The funding was meant to hire thousands of new workers and upgrade enforcement technology. But that plan fell apart. Republicans clawed back much of the money, and Elon’s D.O.G.E. is now eliminating positions instead of creating them. 14 states sue D.O.G.E. over government overreach Elon’s D.O.G.E. isn’t just cutting jobs—it’s also taking control of federal data. Attorneys general from 14 states sued this week, accusing the agency of operating without oversight. The lawsuit, filed in Washington federal court, argues that D.O.G.E. is making decisions only a Senate-confirmed official should be allowed to make. The complaint claims Elon’s team has “virtually unchecked power” and is violating constitutional rules about government agencies. The attorneys general argue that Trump’s executive order didn’t go through Congress, making D.O.G.E. legally questionable. A federal judge ruled in Elon’s favor on Friday, denying an attempt to block D.O.G.E. from accessing government records. Unions and nonprofit groups had filed for a temporary restraining order, trying to stop D.O.G.E. from collecting data from three federal agencies. The Department of Labor, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Judge John Bates, appointed by George W. Bush, said the case was a “close question” but ultimately ruled that D.O.G.E. is an agency. That means it can send its employees to other government offices and access their records under the Economy Act. “The plaintiffs have not shown a substantial likelihood that [D.O.G.E.] is not an agency,” Bates wrote. “If that is so, [D.O.G.E.] may detail its employees to other agencies consistent with the Economy Act.” Federal judge questions D.O.G.E.’s legal structure Elon’s D.O.G.E. was designed to operate outside normal government channels. Instead of answering to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), it reports directly to Trump’s chief of staff. Judge Bates called that structure “odd,” saying D.O.G.E. had been built to “avoid being an agency,” while still claiming agency privileges when it was convenient. “They took great effort to avoid being an agency, but in this case, you’re an agency,” Bates said. “It just seems to strain credulity.” The ruling gives Elon’s team full access to federal data, and the Justice Department is backing them. Government lawyers argued that D.O.G.E. employees are “detailed” government workers, meaning they have legal rights to see sensitive records. Elon reposted the ruling on X, writing: “LFG.” Concerns over Elon’s access to federal data Union attorneys representing Labor Department workers say D.O.G.E. could now access confidential financial, medical, and employment records. Lawyer Mark Samburg told the court that D.O.G.E. employees could pull data on taxpayer information, employee complaints, workplace safety violations, and medical histories. Some records involve ongoing investigations into Elon’s own companies. Tesla and SpaceX are both under review for workplace issues, and there’s concern that D.O.G.E. could get access to those files. Samburg warned that the ruling could have a “chilling effect” on government whistleblowers. Employees might hesitate to report problems or file complaints if they think D.O.G.E. could access their information. “The sensitive information of millions of people is currently at imminent risk of unlawful disclosure,” Samburg said. Unions and advocacy groups pushed for a temporary restraining order to prevent D.O.G.E. from pulling data until stricter oversight was put in place. Judge Bates denied the request. For now, Elon’s agency moves forward. The IRS terminations will happen next week. The layoffs, the data access, and the lawsuits are all in motion. Cryptopolitan Academy: Are You Making These Web3 Resume Mistakes? - Find Out Here

Elon Musk was inside the White House complex when his phone started buzzing. Sam Altman was about to take the stage with Donald Trump. Confused, Musk turned on the TV. What he saw sent him into a rage. Altman stood beside Trump, smiling, as they announced a $500 billion AI initiative called Stargate. Musk had been practically glued to Trump in the months leading up to the second term. He had campaigned for him, spent hundreds of millions backing him, and positioned himself as Trump’s tech confidant. But somehow, his biggest enemy had beaten him to the punch. While Musk was focused on his political influence, Altman had been meeting Trump’s top advisors, locking in deals with SoftBank’s Masayoshi Son and Oracle’s Larry Ellison, and crafting a pitch that Trump couldn’t refuse. Musk’s reaction was immediate. He lashed out to aides, fuming that the Stargate investors didn’t actually have the money they promised. Then he went nuclear. Within days, Musk launched a hostile $97.4 billion bid to seize control of OpenAI. From co-founders to enemies In 2015, Musk and Altman were allies. They had dinner every Wednesday, obsessed over the dangers of AI, and feared a world where artificial intelligence would spiral out of human control. That paranoia led them to co-found OpenAI, a nonprofit designed to counter Google’s dominance in artificial intelligence. Musk pledged the bulk of a $1 billion investment and became the company’s most powerful force. But things changed in 2017. OpenAI realized that staying nonprofit wasn’t sustainable. They needed more money—a lot more. Musk had a solution: take full control and make himself CEO. Altman and OpenAI’s leadership resisted. Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever sided with Altman. They told Musk that giving him total control would create the exact kind of AI dictatorship they had sworn to prevent. Musk was furious. “This is the final straw,” he wrote in an email. Within months, he quit OpenAI. ChatGPT changes everything For years, OpenAI quietly pushed forward without Musk. Then, in November 2022, everything changed. OpenAI released ChatGPT, and AI went mainstream overnight. Millions of users swarmed the platform. Silicon Valley called it the most transformative consumer-tech product since the iPhone. Musk, watching from the outside, was livid. He had walked away, and now Altman was the face of AI. He attacked OpenAI, accusing them of moving too fast and ignoring safety. In early 2023, he signed an open letter calling for a six-month pause on AI development. Then he launched xAI, his own AI company. The goal was simple: beat OpenAI at its own game. But while Altman’s AI empire kept expanding, Musk’s xAI struggled to keep up. By 2024, Musk was done watching from the sidelines. He went on the attack, suing OpenAI for allegedly betraying its original nonprofit mission. The lawsuit dragged on for months. Then Trump won re-election, and Altman saw an opening. Altman outplays Musk in Washington Altman had always been a Democrat, but he wasn’t about to let Musk be the only tech billionaire in Trump’s ear. So he started working his way in. Altman’s strategy was simple but brutal. He met with Howard Lutnick, Trump’s transition team leader, and pitched an AI plan so massive that Trump couldn’t ignore it. That plan was Stargate: a $500 billion investment into U.S. AI infrastructure. Altman lined up SoftBank’s Masayoshi Son and Oracle’s Larry Ellison as key backers. Four days before the inauguration, Ellison brokered a private call between Altman and Trump. Altman sold him on the vision—billions in U.S. data centers, thousands of jobs, a technological leap forward. Trump loved it. When Altman arrived for the inauguration, he made sure to avoid Musk. Instead of sitting with tech CEOs, he met privately with Trump’s allies, making sure Stargate was set. Then, the day after the inauguration, he stepped onto the White House stage with Trump and announced it to the world. Musk found out the same way the rest of the world did—by watching it on TV. Musk declares war Musk erupted. He called Stargate “fake” on X, telling his allies that the investors didn’t actually have the money. But he didn’t stop there. Within days, he launched a $97.4 billion hostile takeover bid for OpenAI. His message to investors? “Let’s go to war with Sam Altman.” Altman, who was in Paris for an AI summit, found out from The Wall Street Journal. He scrambled to respond. On Slack, he reportedly told OpenAI employees that Musk was just trying to derail the company. Then he hit Musk where it hurt. “No thank you,” Altman posted on X, “but we will buy Twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.” It was a brutal response. Musk had overpaid $44 billion for Twitter in 2022—only to see its value collapse. Altman’s counteroffer was a direct slap in the face. Musk wasn’t done. He told investors he would withdraw his bid if OpenAI returned to being a nonprofit. OpenAI’s board didn’t even blink. On Friday, they officially rejected Musk’s offer. “OpenAI is not for sale,” board chairman Bret Taylor wrote in a letter. “Mr. Musk’s latest attempt to disrupt his competition has failed.” Musk’s lawyer, Marc Toberoff, fired back: “No surprise. They’re scared.” Musk framed his takeover as a mission to save OpenAI from itself. “It’s time for OpenAI to return to the open-source, safety-focused force for good it once was,” he said. Altman? He wasn’t buying it. “Probably his whole life is from a position of insecurity,” Altman said in an interview. “I feel for the guy. I don’t think he’s a happy person.” The war between Musk and Altman isn’t over. It’s just beginning.