Prix de ELON CoinELON

Bitwise has announced that its Bitcoin Standard Corporations Index has two new entrants — Fold Holdings and Bitdeer Technologies. Bitwise Investments, a crypto index and exchange-traded funds provider, has added Fold Holdings and Bitdeer Technologies to the Bitwise Bitcoin ( BTC ) Standard Corporations ETF. The asset manager announced their inclusion via a post on X on March 25, 2025. Fold Holdings is a Phoenix-based Bitcoin financial services firm founded in 2019. Meanwhile, Bitdeer Technologies is a Nasdaq-listed Bitcoin miner with operations in the United States, Norway and Bhutan. Fold and Bitdeer join the Bitwise fund targeted at Bitcoin-heavy companies just days after its launch. With the two new additions, the ETF, which trades under the ticker OWNB, now includes 22 companies that hold at least 1,000 BTC in their treasury. “The fund does not invest directly in bitcoin or indirectly through derivatives that reference bitcoin,”Bitwise noted. According to Bitwise, the index tracks notable companies with Bitcoin as treasury assets, including Michael Saylor’s Strategy, bitcoin mining firm MARA Holdings, and Elon Musk’s Tesla. The top 10 companies in the ETF also include Riot Platforms, Metaplanet, and Semler Scientific. Metaplanet has been one of the more aggressive Bitcoin buyers, with its haul of 3,350 BTC reflecting a strategy similar to that of Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy. With OWNB now including 22 companies, the ETF collectively holds more than 648,000 BTC worth over $54 billion, accounting for about 3.2% of the total Bitcoin supply. Notably, Strategy held 506,137 BTC acquired for over $33.7 billion as of March 25, giving it the highest weight in the Bitwise Standard Corporations Index at 22.64%. MARA and Riot follow with weightings of 10.67% and 10.04%, respectively. Metaplanet is weighted at 5%, ranking as the fourth largest holding. Per Bitwise’s OWNB website, Fold holds 1,485 BTC worth roughly $130 million, while Bitdeer holds 1,039 BTC worth about $92 million.

almost everybody has share morning routine, where is elon???

In a stunning revelation that adds political intrigue to an already high-profile legal battle, Reuters has uncovered that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) interim chief, Mark Uyeda, cast the sole dissenting vote against suing Elon Musk earlier this year. The closed-door vote, held just days before Republicans took control of the agency in January, approved a lawsuit over Musk’s delayed disclosure of Twitter stock purchases. The 4-1 decision not only highlights deep internal divisions within the SEC but also raises serious questions about political pressure, regulatory integrity, and the future of enforcement under a Musk-friendly administration. In a quiet but consequential January vote, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) decided 4-1 to sue Elon Musk over his delayed disclosure of Twitter shares. The vote, revealed exclusively by Reuters , exposed a deep rift within the agency. The lone dissenter? Republican Commissioner Mark Uyeda, now the SEC’s interim chief. His "no" vote came just days before a political shift in Washington saw Republicans take control of the agency. The core issue stems from Musk’s 2022 acquisition of Twitter (now X), when he disclosed his stake 21 days late—far beyond the required 10-day window for holdings exceeding 5%. That delay, the SEC argues, allowed him to scoop up more shares at lower prices, saving him $150 million and triggering market movements. The agency sued Musk on January 14, just a week after the commissioners' internal vote. Uyeda, a Republican appointee and close observer of political implications, reportedly questioned the motives behind the lawsuit. Before the vote, he asked SEC enforcement staff to sign pledges that the case was free from political influence—an unusual move rejected by the staff. His opposition was not necessarily about Musk’s actions, but about the optics and timing of the enforcement, which came just before a change in administration. The timing has raised eyebrows. Musk is a known ally of President Donald Trump, and the vote occurred just before Republican leadership took over the SEC. Trump has since issued an executive order accusing the SEC of partisan targeting under Biden and demanded a review of politically driven investigations. Though the SEC declined to comment, the lawsuit’s proximity to the power shift casts doubt on the agency’s neutrality in the eyes of critics. The commission reportedly demanded Musk give up the $150 million in alleged gains and pay an additional penalty. While Uyeda voted no, fellow Republican Hester Peirce sided with the three Democratic commissioners, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. The decision shows an unusual split within Republican ranks and underscores the internal friction over how to deal with the billionaire entrepreneur. Intent was key. SEC investigators explored whether Musk knowingly delayed the filing—a charge that could carry more severe consequences. Musk, however, claimed he misunderstood the rule and eventually complied. The SEC dropped the intent angle but still pursued civil penalties. Musk had agreed to be deposed twice but resisted further interviews, delaying the case until after the 2024 election. Legal experts question the SEC’s sluggish pace. A late filing case is typically straightforward. "Bringing it at the last minute—it loses credibility," said Howard Fischer, a former SEC lawyer. Others argue that not filing at all would have looked like selective enforcement, undermining the agency’s role in upholding fair markets. Musk has until April 4 to respond to the court summons. With Uyeda now leading the SEC and Trump ordering a review of the agency’s actions, the Musk case could become a lightning rod in the wider war over regulatory power and political influence. Musk’s long-standing feud with the SEC—dating back to his 2018 Tesla tweet saga—adds more fuel to the fire. The internal divide within the SEC, revealed in this exclusive report, paints a picture of an agency caught between law and politics. Whether the case against Musk is about justice or timing remains an open question—one that could reshape the future of securities enforcement in a deeply divided America.

Dogecoin has always been the wild card of the crypto space, a meme turned mainstream asset. But as we near April 2025, investors are once again asking the age-old question: Is DOGE about to go to the moon? With Dogecoin price sitting around $0.17, can the beloved token realistically hit $5 next month? Let’s break it down. The daily Heikin Ashi candles on the current chart reveal a market that is attempting to stabilize after a prolonged downtrend. The recent red-to-green candle shift—coupled with a few days of tight-range consolidation—hints at a potential bottoming out. After tumbling from its December highs above $0.40, DOGE price has found support around the $0.16 zone, and this level has acted as a psychological anchor over the last few weeks. The slowing sell momentum could be the first sign of a quiet accumulation phase. >>Click Here to Buy Dogecoin on Bitget<< The Relative Strength Index (RSI) currently reads around 38, which is still in bearish territory but has recently curled upward from oversold levels. This RSI movement suggests a tentative recovery, although not a confirmed trend reversal yet. More importantly, the MACD is showing early bullish signals—the histogram has just flipped to green, and the MACD line is about to cross above the signal line. If the crossover holds over the coming days, we could see upward momentum strengthen heading into April. DOGE price faces strong overhead resistance near $0.20 and again around $0.28, both of which are previous local highs. Breaking above the $0.20 zone will be critical for Dogecoin price to gain enough traction to challenge higher psychological levels. Given current volume trends and the lack of a strong breakout candle, it seems unlikely that these resistance levels will be conquered without a catalyst—such as a major tweet from Elon Musk or broader altcoin market rallies. >>Click Here to Buy Dogecoin on Bitget<< Let’s be blunt: jumping from $0.17 to $5 would require a 2800% increase in less than a month. While crypto has seen miracles before (including DOGE’s own historic 2021 run), such a leap would require unprecedented retail FOMO, exchange inflows, and likely a massive macro narrative shift. A more modest short-term target for April might be $0.25 to $0.30, especially if bullish momentum continues to build. A climb toward $5 remains a long-term fantasy scenario—not an April 2025 reality. >>Click Here to Buy Dogecoin on Bitget<< Given the chart structure, weak but improving indicators, and support near $0.16, Dogecoin is more likely to trade sideways or mildly bullish into early April. If broader altcoins rally or BTC dominance drops, DOGE could climb toward the $0.22–$0.26 range. But without strong volume and community hype, the chance of a parabolic run remains slim. Dogecoin is currently at a technical crossroads —stabilizing but still lacking conviction. Traders looking for a breakout should watch for a strong daily close above $0.20 backed by volume. Until then, this is a consolidation phase. As for the question “Will Dogecoin reach $5 in April 2025?”—the honest answer is: not likely, but a rally toward $0.30 is not off the table if the market aligns.

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US Government announces it will prosecute fraud uncovered by Elon Musk's DOGE.