Preço de Real RealmREAL

*Coinalyze* is a cryptocurrency data analytics platform that provides real-time market data, insights, and tools for traders and investors. Features 1. *Real-time market data*: Provides current prices, trading volumes, and market capitalization. 2. *Charting and analysis*: Offers technical analysis tools and charts. 3. *Market sentiment analysis*: Analyzes market trends and sentiment. 4. *Alerts and notifications*: Allows users to set custom alerts. Use Cases 1. *Trading*: Helps traders make informed decisions. 2. *Investment research*: Supports investors in researching cryptocurrencies. 3. *Market analysis*: Enables analysis of market trends. Coinalyze aims to provide valuable insights and data to cryptocurrency enthusiasts and professionals.

Robert Kiyosaki, author of the best-selling book Rich Dad Poor Dad, has raised eyebrows with a bold prediction about the future of several U.S. states. His book has been a global best seller, translated into more than 50 languages and read by millions worldwide, challenging traditional beliefs about money, investing, and financial freedom. On April 18, Robert Kiyosaki posted on social media platform X, listing what he described as the “Top 10 states that are collapsing because people are leaving,” naming Hawaii as the most likely to collapse. Other states on his list are Mississippi, New Mexico, Alaska, Nevada, West Virginia, Louisiana, New York, Illinois, and California. “Is this list good news or bad news for you?” he then asked his 2.7 million followers. “I feel for the people living in these states.” As of writing, the acclaimed author’s post drew significant attention, racking up 146,000 views and nearly 200 comments. While some users chimed in with reasons why these states could be in trouble—citing rising crime, taxes, or cost of living—others questioned the accuracy and framing of his claims. A large portion of the replies simply asked for more clarification, pushing Kiyosaki to explain his reasoning. One commenter challenged the post, pointing to Census 2025 data showing 42 states with population growth and citing UHERO figures that Hawaii gains 72,000 new residents annually. The commenter also noted Mississippi’s GDP has increased 18.7% since 2000, according to the BEA, adding: “Migration’s real, but ‘collapse’ is wild.” Despite the backlash, the renowned author has long been known for issuing stark warnings about the U.S. economy. The famous author has frequently sounded the alarm on declining trust in fiat currency, unsustainable national debt, and the potential collapse of the U.S. dollar. Kiyosaki encourages his followers to prepare financially by investing in assets like gold, silver, and bitcoin—his preferred hedge against systemic collapse. 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Grok Voice Patterns now support real-time camera analysis on devices

Aptos, the Layer 1 blockchain known for its speed and Move-based development ecosystem, is once again stirring the pot — this time with a bold proposal that could reshape the network's passive income. Aptos Improvement Proposal 119 (AIP-119) proposes a significant reduction in staking rewards, aiming to cut yields from 7% to 3.79% over a short three-month period. But is this a step toward sustainable network development, or a risk to validator decentralization and long-term ecosystem health? Let’s break down what this proposal really means, how it compares to other Layer 1 networks, and what investors, developers, and validators can expect next. AIP-119 is co-authored by Aptos Labs ' Head of Production Engineering, Sherry Xiao, and Mirage developer Moon Shiesty. The proposal seeks to reduce staking rewards by nearly 50% in an effort to discourage passive income, low-effort participation and instead push the ecosystem toward more active, higher-value contributions. The core argument is simple: if rewards for basic staking are reduced, then participants will be incentivized to explore more productive activities like restaking, contributing to decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePIN), or engaging in MEV (Miner Extractable Value) strategies. These activities, while riskier, promise higher and more sustainable returns, potentially adding greater utility and development to the Aptos ecosystem. While the proposed reward reduction may make theoretical sense for long-term growth, not everyone is on board. A key concern raised by validators and node operators revolves around profitability, especially for smaller operators. Aptos , like Solana , requires considerable technical resources and financial commitment to run a node. Without complementary systems like a robust delegation program, lower yields could push smaller validators out — undermining the very decentralization and resilience the network seeks to protect. Moon Shiesty acknowledged this risk directly, suggesting that the Aptos Foundation implement a stake-matching model, similar to Solana’s delegation program, to cushion the impact on small validators. The idea is to rebalance stake toward more active and engaged network participants while maintaining an inclusive validator set. Xiao further supported this direction, proposing a review of current delegations and potentially removing validators who aren't actively contributing to network health. This move would make validator support performance-based, aligning incentives with Aptos' long-term vision of a high-performance and developer-first chain. Currently, Aptos’ staking yield sits at around 7%, placing it well above Ethereum’s average of 3.1% , but slightly below Avalanche’s 7.6% and significantly under Cosmos’ 15%. From a competitive standpoint, cutting rewards could make Aptos less attractive to risk-averse stakers, especially if other chains maintain higher base yields. However, proponents argue that real, utility-based yield — not inflation-driven staking rewards — should be the ultimate goal. The Aptos team is betting that the community will embrace this vision, pushing toward an ecosystem driven by real value creation rather than passive emissions. If successful, this model could differentiate Aptos from other networks and establish it as a leader in efficient capital use and network engagement. The authors of AIP-119 are in the process of gathering community feedback for four weeks before taking the proposal to mainnet governance. Early signals suggest strong community support, although concerns around validator health remain valid and unresolved. If this proposal is approved, the reduction in rewards will likely take effect over a three-month tapering period, giving validators time to adapt or explore alternative revenue models. If Aptos can introduce a delegation or incentive-matching program in parallel, the risk to decentralization could be mitigated. On the flip side, failure to implement protective mechanisms might lead to a centralization of stake among well-funded validators and institutions — a situation that has historically triggered long-term instability in other ecosystems. The likely outcome? If community support remains strong and the Aptos Foundation acts swiftly with supportive measures, AIP-119 could pass with minimal friction and signal a mature, forward-thinking shift in token economics. Expect increased activity in restaking protocols, DePIN infrastructure projects, and yield-generation tooling around the Aptos ecosystem in Q2 and Q3 2025. Aptos, the Layer 1 blockchain known for its speed and Move-based development ecosystem, is once again stirring the pot — this time with a bold proposal that could reshape the network's passive income. Aptos Improvement Proposal 119 (AIP-119) proposes a significant reduction in staking rewards, aiming to cut yields from 7% to 3.79% over a short three-month period. But is this a step toward sustainable network development, or a risk to validator decentralization and long-term ecosystem health? Let’s break down what this proposal really means, how it compares to other Layer 1 networks, and what investors, developers, and validators can expect next. AIP-119 is co-authored by Aptos Labs ' Head of Production Engineering, Sherry Xiao, and Mirage developer Moon Shiesty. The proposal seeks to reduce staking rewards by nearly 50% in an effort to discourage passive income, low-effort participation and instead push the ecosystem toward more active, higher-value contributions. The core argument is simple: if rewards for basic staking are reduced, then participants will be incentivized to explore more productive activities like restaking, contributing to decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePIN), or engaging in MEV (Miner Extractable Value) strategies. These activities, while riskier, promise higher and more sustainable returns, potentially adding greater utility and development to the Aptos ecosystem. While the proposed reward reduction may make theoretical sense for long-term growth, not everyone is on board. A key concern raised by validators and node operators revolves around profitability, especially for smaller operators. Aptos , like Solana , requires considerable technical resources and financial commitment to run a node. Without complementary systems like a robust delegation program, lower yields could push smaller validators out — undermining the very decentralization and resilience the network seeks to protect. Moon Shiesty acknowledged this risk directly, suggesting that the Aptos Foundation implement a stake-matching model, similar to Solana’s delegation program, to cushion the impact on small validators. The idea is to rebalance stake toward more active and engaged network participants while maintaining an inclusive validator set. Xiao further supported this direction, proposing a review of current delegations and potentially removing validators who aren't actively contributing to network health. This move would make validator support performance-based, aligning incentives with Aptos' long-term vision of a high-performance and developer-first chain. Currently, Aptos’ staking yield sits at around 7%, placing it well above Ethereum’s average of 3.1% , but slightly below Avalanche’s 7.6% and significantly under Cosmos’ 15%. From a competitive standpoint, cutting rewards could make Aptos less attractive to risk-averse stakers, especially if other chains maintain higher base yields. However, proponents argue that real, utility-based yield — not inflation-driven staking rewards — should be the ultimate goal. The Aptos team is betting that the community will embrace this vision, pushing toward an ecosystem driven by real value creation rather than passive emissions. If successful, this model could differentiate Aptos from other networks and establish it as a leader in efficient capital use and network engagement. The authors of AIP-119 are in the process of gathering community feedback for four weeks before taking the proposal to mainnet governance. Early signals suggest strong community support, although concerns around validator health remain valid and unresolved. If this proposal is approved, the reduction in rewards will likely take effect over a three-month tapering period, giving validators time to adapt or explore alternative revenue models. If Aptos can introduce a delegation or incentive-matching program in parallel, the risk to decentralization could be mitigated. On the flip side, failure to implement protective mechanisms might lead to a centralization of stake among well-funded validators and institutions — a situation that has historically triggered long-term instability in other ecosystems. The likely outcome? If community support remains strong and the Aptos Foundation acts swiftly with supportive measures, AIP-119 could pass with minimal friction and signal a mature, forward-thinking shift in token economics. Expect increased activity in restaking protocols, DePIN infrastructure projects, and yield-generation tooling around the Aptos ecosystem in Q2 and Q3 2025.

After years of economic tension, the United States and China are on the brink of finalising a historic trade deal. The announcement by President Trump that the tariff war is nearing its end has injected fresh optimism into global markets . But beyond traditional stocks and commodities, crypto investors are asking a very specific question: Will Bitcoin (BTC) now break through the $100,000 mark? The US China tariff standoff disrupted global supply chains, hurt investor sentiment, and triggered volatility across financial markets. With tariffs as high as 145% on some goods, the trade war slowed economic growth and spooked institutions from taking risks. Now, with a resolution in sight: Bitcoin has become a barometer for global liquidity and investor confidence. Historically, it performs well when macro fears fade and capital flows into riskier assets. With the tariff war fading into the background: 🔵 Current Range: $70K–$80K 🟢 Bullish Target (Q2–Q3 2025): $100K–$110K 🔴 Risk: BTC may stall if other macro factors (e.g., interest rates) remain tight. Bitcoin isn’t just reacting to charts — it’s now deeply connected to macro events. The end of the US China tariff war could remove one of the biggest global risk factors holding back growth. If the deal is finalised and markets stay in recovery mode, BTC has a real chance to hit — or even surpass — the $100K milestone in 2025. After years of economic tension, the United States and China are on the brink of finalising a historic trade deal. The announcement by President Trump that the tariff war is nearing its end has injected fresh optimism into global markets . But beyond traditional stocks and commodities, crypto investors are asking a very specific question: Will Bitcoin (BTC) now break through the $100,000 mark? The US China tariff standoff disrupted global supply chains, hurt investor sentiment, and triggered volatility across financial markets. With tariffs as high as 145% on some goods, the trade war slowed economic growth and spooked institutions from taking risks. Now, with a resolution in sight: Bitcoin has become a barometer for global liquidity and investor confidence. Historically, it performs well when macro fears fade and capital flows into riskier assets. With the tariff war fading into the background: 🔵 Current Range: $70K–$80K 🟢 Bullish Target (Q2–Q3 2025): $100K–$110K 🔴 Risk: BTC may stall if other macro factors (e.g., interest rates) remain tight. Bitcoin isn’t just reacting to charts — it’s now deeply connected to macro events. The end of the US China tariff war could remove one of the biggest global risk factors holding back growth. If the deal is finalised and markets stay in recovery mode, BTC has a real chance to hit — or even surpass — the $100K milestone in 2025.