Push Protocol PricePUSH

While BTC remains strong structurally, there are a few market signals and levels worth watching: - BTC hasn’t had a meaningful pullback since 79k, some reversion may be due. - Resistance was tagged near $113k, aligning with a trendline from 2017–2025 tops. - Still, price action looks healthy: slow grind → pause → push → repeat. - Euphoria, leverage, and funding metrics aren’t flashing red, no mania yet. Key BTC Zones to Watch - If market is extremely bullish, it holds here - perfect retest of wick high - The sweet spot for a pullback, at least locally, is $104.5k -> $106k - $98k–$100k: deeper pullback area, could trigger on major liquidation - Below $98k: structural shift, signals downside ahead Trump’s new tariffs added noise, but macro focus is shifting toward yields and currency debasement. Market just has to stomach the new info, digest it, and continue. @LuckyXBT__ 📈

In a remarkable display of investor appetite, BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) surged to the top of ETF inflows across the entire U.S. market on a single-day basis. This rare feat, as highlighted by Bloomberg Senior ETF Analyst Eric Balchunas, marks the first time IBIT has outpaced every other ETF in daily net flows including the ever-dominant VOO, which took an unusual backseat. IBIT’s one-day inflow of $877.18 million underscores the intensified investor frenzy following Bitcoin’s recent push to all-time highs, propelling the total net flows into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs to an impressive $44.5 billion since inception. Beyond the day’s standout performance, IBIT has also built impressive momentum over the longer term. The fund attracted $2.13 billion over the past week and $7.56 billion over the past month. These gains point to sustained institutional interest in crypto-backed securities, a trend growing stronger as regulatory clarity improves and mainstream adoption expands. Related: Beat Holdings Quadruples Bitcoin ETF Bet to $34M, Buys More IBIT Meanwhile, TLT, the long-duration Treasury bond ETF, followed closely with $851.83 million in daily flows and over $2.21 billion weekly. Although it slightly edged out IBIT on the weekly chart, its monthly figure of $4.06 billion still trails IBIT’s gains. The fund’s appeal stems from interest rate speculation and hedging strategies as the Federal Reserve signals a potential shift in policy. FTLS, a lesser-known long/short equity ETF, posted a surprising $808.38 million in single-day inflows. Interestingly, its weekly and monthly flows remain nearly identical, suggesting a recent spike in investor attention rather than steady accumulation. While many ETFs gained traction, others showed mixed investor sentiment. IVV saw $761.47 million enter in one day but suffered significant outflows of $7.19 billion weekly and $16.1 billion monthly. This discrepancy could reflect short-term trading strategies or portfolio rotations. Related: BlackRock CEO “Surprised” by Bitcoin ETF’s Record-Breaking Demand On the flip side, EFV, a developed markets value ETF, recorded strong flows across all periods, especially a $2.93 billion weekly inflow. VOO also posted notable long-term strength with $14.66 billion added in one month despite a quiet day. However, gold-backed GLD continued its recent struggle. While gaining $423.76 million in one day, it faced monthly outflows nearing $2.43 billion. This signals a shifting preference toward risk assets like equities and Bitcoin. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

So I sold the entries I took at the recent bottom before the dump. Feels good to be on the right side in this noisy week by whales Now what's next? As you know I was already leaning to a correction to happen end of May to validate the "sell in may" narrative by the whales since now they are telling the truth. I'm planning to get back some longs on the next key HTF levels (maybe 2k eth?) for a pump to happen in June. The "sell in may" may become a bear trap to just reverse it for a final push for altcoins in June and to be out by July/early august. Another intesring post was this by Beeple This post is very deep from whales. Can you see through it? Can you see what it clearly means? The first bearish post from whales in quite some time. Remember they are telling the truth now. So bearish post= bearish PA. This was posted this morning before the dump. Look closer into the pic and analyse. You can see rats (symbolises rat race=retail?) some hangovers after a party of ATH? BTC 111k etc....

European investors didn’t blink when Trump declared he was “recommending” a 50% tariff on every single import coming from the European Union, a threat he dropped Friday on Truth Social, right before US and EU officials were set to meet. The Stoxx Europe 600 index closed down just 1%, shaking off the news like a mild cold. That’s a soft reaction compared to the sharp losses—between 2.5% and 5%—markets suffered back in April when Trump posted similar threats during what he called “Liberation Day.” According to CNBC, most analysts think this latest escalation isn’t a policy ready to launch, but a negotiating bomb designed to scare Brussels into giving Washington more ground in upcoming talks. The language Trump used and the timing of his post both fueled that theory. He didn’t say the US would impose the tariff. He said he was recommending it. There’s a difference, and Ajay Rajadhyaksha, global chair of research at Barclays, pointed it out. “We believe that this morning’s social media posts about a 50% tariff on the EU are primarily a negotiating tactic,” Ajay wrote to clients. He also said “we are guessing here—as is everyone else—but we remain of the belief that the 50% tariff on all EU goods on June 1 won’t actually go ahead.” Even so, Ajay admitted the final number could still surprise markets. He had earlier forecasted 14% to 17% average tariffs. Now, he says that was probably too low. “The EU will not end up with 50%, we think, but it now seems the continent could end up with (say) 20%,” he said. Andrew Kenningham, chief Europe economist at Capital Economics, said something similar. He called the 50% tariff “very unlikely to be where tariffs settle over the long run,” and made it clear the risk wasn’t zero. Andrew warned that if the full tariff ever happened, Germany’s GDP could shrink by 1.7% in just three years. And if the tax hit the pharmaceutical sector, Ireland might be worse off. He still expects tariffs to land around 10%, but said the road to a final deal “could be rocky.” The math on the US side is just as bad. The United States brought in $606 billion in European goods last year. If Trump hit all of it with a 50% tax, the direct cost would land at $300 billion. Ajay ran the numbers and said that about 60% of the cost would fall on US buyers. That’s $180 billion that American consumers, not European firms, would pay. Ajay pointed to the 2018 trade war with China. “The US arguably saw this coming in the case of China and decided that it was too high a price to pay,” he said. “We think it unlikely that the US will be willing to risk a repeat, and this time with its largest trading partner.” Europe isn’t just standing around. Inga Fechner, senior economist at ING, said the EU has already drafted retaliatory tariffs , and they’re scheduled to hit on July 14 if the White House pushes forward. Inga called Trump’s play “a prelude to negotiation,” similar to how he acted before announcing a short-lived deal with China earlier in May. But if talks collapse, Brussels has more than just tariffs ready. Inga warned the EU might tighten regulations on US tech, stall new licenses, block public procurement, and limit investment and IP access using the Anti-Coercion Instrument. And she said if Trump follows through, it could drag the eurozone’s GDP down by 0.6 percentage points, enough to push the bloc close to recession. Salomon Fiedler, an economist with Berenberg, said both sides would take heavy hits if the 50% tariff becomes real. He also said the added cost pressure could extend high interest rates in the US, because the Federal Reserve might delay any cuts. “Given the damage the US would do to itself with this tariff, he will probably not follow through,” Salomon added. But he said the threat itself was enough to lock in Trump’s 10% baseline tariff, which he’d already slapped on almost every trade partner. Your crypto news deserves attention - KEY Difference Wire puts you on 250+ top sites

The United States government is close to enacting its first crypto legislation, the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. However, Democratic lawmakers are pushing to include protections against corruption from public officials, especially the family of President Donald Trump. According to a report from Axios, a group of senators insists the bill needs to be amended to prevent Trump and his inner circle members from profiting from stablecoins and selling influence to the highest bidder. The GENIUS Act will establish the first regulatory framework for stablecoins in the U.S. Senator Bill Hagerty introduced the bill in February, with co-sponsorship from Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Cynthia Lummis. If enacted, the bill will establish a federal licensing and supervisory framework for stablecoins, requiring their issuers to undergo regular security audits. The legislation will limit stablecoin issuance to licensed entities and prohibit trading assets that are not fully backed. Before the bill passed in the Senate earlier this week, Democrats had raised concerns about potential conflicts with Trump’s crypto investments. Although they had previously withdrawn their support, most of them, except for Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, eventually voted yes. With the GENIUS Act a few steps away from becoming law, Democrats once again insist that amendments be made to include protections against corruption. Senators Jeff Merkley, Elizabeth Warren, and Schumer are pushing to file the amendment before the legislation passes the Senate. Senators Gary Peters, Jack Reed, Chris Murphy, and Michael Bennet are co-sponsoring the amendment. Although most of these lawmakers have voted in favor of the bill, sources familiar with the matter revealed that they may withdraw their support if the legislation lacks protections against corruption. As the push for amendment continues, Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat, insists the bill should be passed regardless of concerns about the Trump family. He said the possibility of corruption should not blind the U.S. government to the broader reality that blockchain technology is here to stay. These concerns come as the Trump family’s crypto business, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), launches a new stablecoin, USD1. The asset has already scored a deal to become the settlement currency for Abu Dhabi-based MGX’s $2 billion investment in crypto exchange Binance. Meanwhile, top Democrat lawmakers have launched an investigation into Trump’s crypto venture over concerns of illegal fundraising, abuse of political power, and foreign influence.