Cena MultichainMULTI

Safe{Wallet} published a post that the hacker attack on Bybit worth more than $1.4 billion was launched by the North Korean-linked group TraderTraitor (UNC4899). The attackers bypassed multi-factor authentication by hacking into the developer's notebook and hijacking the AWS…

Blockchain oracle RedStone launches RED token, enabling staking and paving the way for multi-asset rewards

Cardano (ADA) is mirroring past bull cycles, with analysts predicting a breakout above the critical $1.50 resistance level, potentially triggering a major rally. Here is the latest Cardano price prediction for March 2025 , ahead of the White House crypto summit. Cardano (ADA) is consolidating within a descending broadening wedge, a bullish reversal pattern that often precedes a strong upward breakout. Analysts have identified $1.50 as the key resistance level, and a successful breakout above this zone could propel ADA toward $2 and beyond. Cardano has previously followed multi-phase consolidation cycles that led to price surges ranging from 200% to 300%. If ADA replicates its past bull cycle, analysts forecast a potential rally toward $2.50, representing a 250% increase from its current valuation. The current price structure is similar to past bull runs, signaling that ADA may be on the verge of another explosive move. On-chain data indicates that whales have accumulated over 420 million ADA tokens , signaling growing confidence from institutional investors. Historically, whale accumulation precedes major breakouts, reinforcing the bullish sentiment around ADA’s price movement . With technical indicators aligning, whale accumulation increasing, and historical price patterns repeating, Cardano appears poised to break above the $1.50 resistance level. If confirmed, this breakout could trigger an extended rally toward $2 and possibly $2.50 in the coming months. Traders and investors should closely monitor key resistance and support levels for potential entry points. Waiting for the March 7th event, the White House crypto summit, highly awaited by traders, following the last Trump posts about the strategic crypto reserve . Tomorrow, only one day ahead, how likely is it for ADA price to surge past the $1.50 resistance level? And what about after the White House crypto summit, following any major announcement? Investors and traders alike are awaiting this Friday's crypto news!

We are now seeing the revolution of money. The battle between traditional government-issued currencies and cryptocurrency reshapes the financial ecosystem. This is forcing individuals, businesses, and policymakers to rethink the very nature of money itself. While fiat currencies have ruled for centuries under government control, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are challenging this monopoly, presenting a borderless, censorship-resistant alternative. But are cryptocurrencies the future of finance, or do they remain a speculative asset vulnerable to volatility and regulatory crackdowns? This article breaks down the core differences between crypto and fiat, looking at their impact on economic stability, inflation, security, and global adoption. The key difference between cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies is who controls them. Fiat currencies, such as the U.S. dollar (USD) and the Euro (EUR), are government-issued and centrally regulated. Their supply is controlled through monetary policies, such as interest rate adjustments and money printing. Fiat currencies also have unlimited supplies, as governments can print more money as needed, which can lead to inflation. This happened during the 2008 financial crisis and COVID-19 stimulus programs. On the other hand, cryptocurrencies are decentralized and operate on blockchain networks without government control. Transactions are verified through decentralized consensus mechanisms, such as Proof of Work (PoW) or Proof of Stake (PoS. Also, cryptocurrencies have limited supplies. For instance, Bitcoin (BTC) has a fixed cap (21 million BTC), making it resistant to inflation. Additionally, unlike fiat, crypto can be sent globally without intermediaries or banking restrictions like fiat. One of the most significant differences between fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies is how governments regulate and recognize them. Fiat currencies operate within strict legal frameworks, while cryptocurrencies exist in a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape that varies by country. Fiat currencies are fully regulated and enforced by law. Central banks, such as the Federal Reserve (U.S.) and the European Central Bank (ECB), control their issuance and ensure stability through monetary policies. Conversely, cryptocurrencies operate in a legal gray area in many regions. Some countries have embraced them, while others have banned or restricted their use due to concerns over illicit activity, tax evasion, and financial stability. While fiat transactions are private but heavily monitored, cryptocurrencies, depending on the blockchain, provide varying degrees of transparency and pseudonymity. Fiat transactions are not publicly visible, but banks, financial institutions, and government agencies heavily track them. Cryptocurrencies operate on public ledgers, where transactions are visible to anyone, but user identities are not directly linked to wallet addresses. Fiat currencies have an unlimited supply controlled by governments, while many cryptocurrencies have fixed or limited issuance, making them resistant to inflation. As mentioned earlier, fiat is issued by central banks, which can increase or decrease the money supply to influence economic conditions. However, excessive money printing can lead to inflation or hyperinflation, reducing purchasing power. Fiat currency is naturally inflationary, as it loses value over time due to the continuous expansion of the money supply. Additionally, it has hyperinflation risks, as countries with weak economic policies can experience severe inflation, drastically devaluing their currency. For instance, Venezuela’s inflation rate exceeded 1,000,000% in 2018 due to excessive money printing, rendering its currency nearly worthless. Unlike fiat currency, most cryptocurrencies have a predetermined supply that cannot be changed by a central authority, making them deflationary or resistant to inflation. Also, Ethereum moved to Proof of Stake (PoS), reducing its supply through burning mechanisms (EIP-1559). Fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies handle transactions differently. While fiat transactions rely on banks and financial intermediaries, cryptocurrencies use decentralized blockchain networks to process payments without intermediaries. Fiat transactions are processed through banks, payment networks (Visa, Mastercard), and financial institutions that act as intermediaries. Banks often allow fraudulent or mistaken transactions to be disputed and reversed. Cryptocurrency, however, operates on blockchain networks, where transactions are verified by miners (Proof of Work) or validators (Proof of Stake). Transactions are sent directly between users without banks or payment processors. Once confirmed, transactions cannot be reversed, which reduces fraud but removes chargeback protections. Security is crucial in fiat and cryptocurrency transactions, but the risks and protective measures differ. Fiat transactions rely on centralized oversight and consumer protection laws, while cryptocurrencies use cryptographic security but are vulnerable to hacking and scams. Banks, financial regulators, and anti-fraud systems safeguard fiat transactions. However, centralization makes them vulnerable to identity theft and institutional failures. Banks employ fraud detection, encryption, and transaction monitoring to prevent unauthorized access. Meanwhile, credit card companies and banks allow users to dispute fraudulent transactions and recover lost funds. However, government currency is poised to fiat-based fraud, including identity theft, counterfeit currency, and bank fraud, which remains a significant problem. For example, in 2023, credit card fraud losses exceeded $30 billion worldwide, driven by data breaches and phishing attacks. In contrast to government currency, cryptocurrencies leverage blockchain and cryptography for enhanced security, but the lack of a central authority means users bear full responsibility for protecting their funds. Meanwhile, Crypto wallets and exchanges are frequent targets for hacks, phishing attacks, and rug pulls. Losing a private key means permanent loss of funds. For instance, the Bybit exchange was hacked in February, and hackers stole $1.4 billion in the largest single hack in crypto history. Related: Bybit CEO: $1.4 Billion Crypto Hack Tracked, Majority Potentially Recoverable Meanwhile, crypto users rely on self-custody security. They must safeguard their assets using hardware wallets, multi-signature security, and strong authentication methods. One of the contrasts between fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies is their level of price stability. While fiat currencies are relatively stable thanks to central bank controls, cryptocurrencies are highly volatile, with prices fluctuating rapidly based on market demand. Fiat currencies maintain relatively stable value due to government regulation and monetary policies. For example, the U.S. dollar has lost over 97% of its purchasing power since 1913 due to inflation. On the other hand, cryptocurrencies experience extreme price swings, often moving 10–20% daily due to speculation, investor sentiment, and market demand. For example, Bitcoin reached its all-time high in January 2025, when it traded above $109,000, but it is currently trading below $88,000. The adoption of fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies differs significantly. While fiat is universally accepted and legally required for transactions, crypto adoption is growing but remains limited due to regulatory uncertainty and volatility. Fiat currencies are the default medium of exchange in every country. They are legally enforced, meaning businesses and individuals must accept them for transactions. However, despite their rapid growth, cryptocurrencies are not universally accepted and face regulatory challenges that limit their mainstream use. The environmental impact of fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies varies significantly. While fiat money production consumes physical resources, cryptocurrencies, especially Proof-of-Work (PoW) networks like Bitcoin, require high energy consumption for mining. However, newer crypto models are becoming more eco-friendly. The production and circulation of fiat currencies involve printing banknotes, minting coins, and running financial infrastructure. For instance, the U.S. Federal Reserve prints over $700 billion in new banknotes annually, requiring vast amounts of paper and ink. While this has an environmental impact, it is relatively low compared to energy-intensive crypto mining. On the other hand, cryptocurrency mining, particularly Proof-of-Work (PoW) blockchains, consumes vast amounts of energy due to computational mining processes. However, newer models are reducing their carbon footprint. For instance, Bitcoin’s annual energy consumption is estimated at 86 TWh, which is comparable to Argentina’s entire electricity usage. However, more than 50% of Bitcoin mining is powered by renewable energy. Both fiat currencies and cryptocurrencies are undergoing significant transformations due to technological advancements, regulatory shifts, and changing global economic conditions. Governments and central banks are adapting to digital innovation by modernizing fiat currency infrastructure and exploring Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). Related: Swiss National Bank: Crypto Not Ready for Prime Time, CBDC Is Key Crypto markets have seen major innovations in blockchain scalability, regulation, and institutional adoption, which have driven mainstream interest and investment. The debate between government currencies and cryptocurrencies is not limited to technology but also concerns the future of money itself. Government currencies have long been the foundation of global economies, offering stability, government backing, and universal acceptance. However, they are susceptible to inflation, central control, and economic manipulation. Conversely, cryptocurrencies represent a decentralized, transparent, and borderless alternative that empowers individuals to control their wealth without intermediaries. Yet, their volatility, regulatory uncertainty, and security risks remain significant challenges to mass adoption. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Back in late February, blockchain interoperability protocol Axelar (AXL) announced a partnership with American fintech firm Ripple to improve the interoperability of the XRP Ledger (XRPL), creating seamless connectivity with numerous blockchain networks. Axelar’s integration will further amplify XRPL’s use cases, unlocking cross-chain applications and potentially boosting XRP adoption among developers and enterprises. The collaboration places XRPL in a broader multi-chain environment, which could attract liquidity and stimulate demand for XRP as it becomes more functional beyond its traditional remittance use case. Notably, adding to the upbeat sentiment around Axelar, Canary Capital filed an S-1 registration with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to launch an exchange-traded fund (ETF) tracking the Axelar (AXL) token. The ETF would offer exposure to AXL’s cross-chain capabilities across key ecosystems, including XRPL, Hedera, Stellar, Solana, and Bitcoin. The news has already sparked a 14% surge in AXL’s price, according to CoinMarketCap data . Adding to the momentum, Brian Brooks, former US Comptroller of the Currency, has joined the Axelar Foundation as an advisor. His involvement suggests that institutional players are increasingly recognizing the value of cross-chain infrastructure, potentially extending to broader market sentiment regarding XRP. At the time of writing, XRP trades at $$2.51, up 1.31% in the past 24 hours. The daily chart provided by TradingView below shows that the Relative Strength Index (RSI) sits at 50.25, hovering around the neutral zone. Related: XRP Will Head For $13 Soon If The Altcoin Meets Certain Conditions — Analyst This implies that XRP is neither overbought nor oversold, leaving room for both upward and downward movement. The gradient of the line points to measured movement in the near term. Related: Ripple CTO David Schwartz Confirms XRP Sales Are Necessary to Fund Operations, Prioritizing Company Interests The MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) shows that the MACD line (blue) is above the signal line (orange) with the histogram showing bullish momentum with green bars. The 20-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) has been reclaimed and investors might see XRP retest this level at $2.48. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.