Cena BidaoBID

I spy a genny wealth entry on $FORT Ez bid, will come back to this at 100m+

I dropped more bids on $BID here 5X to ATH, and I believe it sends higher from there In one minute, you can now launch any AI Agent on the Bnb chain with @CreatorBid This is a runner no doubt.

Every time I come on here I see a level people want to bid or short and look at it like wtf are these people thinking if we get this level it’ll go much lower or higher cause it’s breaks structure fully.

Hong Kong-based crypto firm HashKey has launched a new initiative to rate cryptocurrencies and exchanges in a bid to enhance market transparency and compliance. Cryptocurrency trading group HashKey has unveiled a new initiative to rate cryptocurrencies and crypto exchanges in Hong Kong to help the local crypto businesses align with regulatory framework for virtual assets, issued by the Securities and Futures Commission. In an X post on Thursday, March 27, HashKey said it partnered with the Hong Kong Virtual Asset Rating Company, which will provide three key services: virtual asset ratings, exchange ratings, and virtual asset indices. According to HashKey, the initiative aims to build an “industry evaluation ecosystem” offering “objective quantitative standards” for both exchanges and investors. The goal is to strengthen market transparency and create compliance benchmarks, which, in turn, could help solidify Hong Kong’s role as a global virtual asset hub. Per HashKey, the ratings would provide risk indicators to help investors make more informed decisions. Earlier in February, Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission proposed increasing its staff, with a particular focus on monitoring virtual asset trading platforms, improving market surveillance, and ramping up enforcement. In its budget plan for the 2025–26 financial year, the SFC is seeking 15 new hires, eight of whom will be dedicated to virtual asset regulation. HashKey secured a $30 million investment from Beijing-based Gaorong Ventures, which valued the company at $1.5 billion. The investment came shortly after HashKey Capital, the group’s investment arm, received approval from the SFC to manage crypto investment products for high-net-worth clients.

Kain Warwick, the co-founder of the decentralized derivatives platform Synthetix, has shed light on what he describes as the deceptive tactics employed by market makers (MMs) to manipulate cryptocurrency prices. In a detailed post on X, Warwick explained the evolution of these entities, from their initial role in facilitating exchange listings to orchestrating intricate price schemes that often leave retail investors holding devalued assets as exit liquidity. During the initial coin offering (ICO) boom, Warwick noted that projects were typically required to pay market makers substantial fees, ranging from $50,000 to $300,000 per month, to secure listings on cryptocurrency exchanges and attract significant investors. He pointed out that without these often costly deals, it was nearly impossible for emerging projects to secure the necessary capital and exchange listings. However, Warwick highlighted that as early as 2017, some market makers began to shift their focus towards more manipulative tactics. Instead of prioritizing genuine liquidity provision, these MMs allegedly started artificially inflating trading volumes on smaller, lesser-known exchanges while strategically avoiding scrutiny on major platforms like Binance and Kraken. Warwick outlined how market makers began using call option structures to profit from price manipulation. Rather than providing genuine liquidity to the market, these MMs would allegedly engage in tactics to artificially pump up the prices of tokens. Once the price reached a certain level, they would exercise their call options and then quickly dump their holdings onto the market for profit. Related: Senator Warren Questions Trump Administration Over Crypto Policy Conflicts, Market Manipulation Accusations The low float strategy, which involves launching a token with a limited number of coins initially available for trading, and which gained popularity through figures like Sam Bankman-Fried, further amplified the value and effectiveness of these manipulative call option schemes. With fewer tokens in circulation at the time of launch, market makers could exert more control over the price action. They would allegedly sell into market bids to create artificial buying pressure, short the token to further drive down the price, and then buy back their positions at lower prices, ensuring maximum profits from these orchestrated price swings. According to Warwick, projects now sell discounted tokens to liquidity funds before their Token Generation Event (TGE). These funds then agree to strategically bid on the market, creating a false impression of strong demand for the token. Simultaneously, a large portion of tokens is sent to exit-strategy MMs, who then proceed to dump these tokens into the artificially inflated market. Related: Justin Sun Accuses Coin.com of Market Manipulation, Gets Accused Back This cycle enables MMs and early investors to exit with profits while leaving retail buyers holding devalued tokens. Warwick cautioned that large token transfers to market makers should be viewed as a red flag, potentially indicating such manipulative schemes are underway. Warwick criticized these tactics, emphasizing that a legitimate market maker should focus on providing liquidity with tight bid-ask spreads rather than manipulating prices. He urged investors to demand greater transparency from projects engaging with MMs. He also revealed that Synthetix was among the first projects to be exploited by DWF Labs. Warwick stated that DWF Labs purportedly purchased treasury tokens from Synthetix, artificially pumped the price in a low-liquidity environment, and then proceeded to dump their holdings for profit, leaving Synthetix and its community with the consequences. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.