Prezzo di LeverFiLEVER

Storms can break out in the blink of an eye in the crypto sphere. Mantra (OM), once hailed by its supporters, has just suffered a vertiginous 95% drop. As accusations of manipulation and opacity fly, John Mullin, CEO of the project, steps up. Between firm denial and promises of recovery, the scenario mixes a crisis of confidence and survival strategies. The collapse of Mantra (OM) has awakened the old demons of the crypto-sphere: insider sales, rug pull, opacity… Allegations that John Mullin dismisses with a wave of his hand. During a recent exchange with the community, the CEO described these rumors as fantasies unrelated to reality. Laser Digital , accused of an alleged leak before the crash, would be innocent. “No wallet linked to our partners was emptied,” he insists, brandishing a transparency report meant to clarify the origin of the transactions. But then, what is the cause of this collapse? Mullin points to a technical domino effect: massive liquidations on exchange platforms. Specifically, traders would have used the OM crypto as collateral for loans. When the price began to shake, bots took over, automatically selling cryptos to cover losses. A cold, almost mechanical chain of events that would have precipitated the fall. “It’s not a criminal scenario, just an algorithm gone wild,” he summarizes. To reverse the trend, Mantra envisions a bold move: buying back OM cryptos on the market and burning part of them. A classic but risky strategy aimed at creating artificial scarcity. “We will inject our own liquidity if necessary,” Mullin says. The question remains whether these purchases will be enough to calm the now wary investors’ psychosis. At the heart of the turmoil, Mantra unveils its secret weapon: an ecosystem fund of 109 million dollars. “This money is a safety net, but also a lever to rebuild,” explains Mullin . Intended to finance partnerships, technical developments and marketing campaigns, this windfall could breathe new life into the OM crypto. Yet, the community whispers: what if this fund is primarily used to cover the project’s flaws? Despite doubts, the numbers speak: the OM crypto has slightly recovered, now flirting with 0.60$, for a capitalization of 585 million dollars. A fragile improvement, hailed by the team as a sign of resilience. “We are going through a crisis, not a shipwreck,” Mullin tempers. Some observers see, however, a mirage, reminding that massive buybacks can temporarily distort the market. The road will be long. Between buyback procedures, fund management and regaining trust, Mantra will have to juggle expectations and suspicions. “Transparency will be our mantra,” promises the CEO, skillfully playing on words. But in an ecosystem where promises often shatter, the challenge is great. The collapse of Mantra (OM) reveals a harsh truth: in crypto, crises arise as quickly as hopes. While Mullin tries to extinguish the fire with technical explanations and emergency measures, mistrust persists. The 109 million fund and token buybacks offer a lifeline, but will they be enough to avoid the shipwreck?

Following the successive sharp declines of tokens such as ACT, TST, MASK, and LEVER, OM on Binance experienced another short-term massive drop between 0:30 and 2:55 (UTC+8) today. Within about an hour, OM plunged more than 80%. OM is the native token of the MANTRA project.

On April 12, Donald Trump surprised the markets by lifting a series of tariffs on strategic technological products. This move, amid ongoing rivalry with China, instantly propelled bitcoin beyond $85,000. Far from a mere trade adjustment, this decision reshapes industrial balances and sends a strong message: American economic policy is now aligned with the interests of digital actors and the crypto sector. This Saturday, the Trump administration announced that certain technological products would no longer be subject to tariffs imposed in the context of trade tensions with Beijing . Indeed, this exemption specifically concerns smartphones, electronic chips, and other strategic components. “These are products we need to remain competitive“, stated Donald Trump. He emphasizes that this measure was taken “to prevent stifling our technology industry at a time when we are in a position of strength“. This decision fits into a broader strategy of adjusting trade barriers, in a context where the United States seeks to maintain its supremacy over global supply chains. The details of this exemption specify that : This tariff orientation gives a boost to domestic production without harming consumers. Several players in the tech sector see it as encouragement to invest in research and to strengthen industrial capabilities on American soil. In the hours following the announcement, financial markets showed a clear upward trend. The S&P 500 closed higher, reflecting an improvement in investor confidence amid geopolitical uncertainty. However, it is mainly in the crypto universe that the impact has been most spectacular. Bitcoin, the main barometer of the crypto market, surged above $85,000. It capitalized on general optimism and the prospect of a smoother technological supply chain. For some analysts, this progression reflects an anticipation of the indirect benefits that the Web3 ecosystem could derive. Lower tariffs on electronic components could facilitate the production of mining hardware or projects related to artificial intelligence. Raoul Pal, a former executive at Goldman Sachs, believes this announcement is “typical of a Trumpian negotiating strategy“, where trade measures serve as both a tactical lever and a political signal. The administration thus seems to want to strengthen its position against Beijing by tightening conditions for China while relieving pressure on its economic allies. This hybrid posture could have long-term implications, particularly on bilateral negotiations and on international technological value chains. If the revival of the crypto market proves durable, it could also encourage other governments to consider customs regulation as a strategic tool in the race for digital sovereignty.

Let's #BTC# say what's going on just now, just the first good, pulled 23%, and then I took a look at it and drove with confidence, and then I felt wrong with a sharp pullback, with a high probability of going down, because my leverage is very large, so I may take you to lose a lot of money, so I flattened in the morning position, and then 81000 or more and a little resistance level, and the U.S. stock market opened, liquidity strengthened, and tentatively bought two positions, The result is still not right, and then stop the loss directly, after all, there is hope for the principal. The final result is a long and short double explosion market tonight. Especially with a big lever like me. Lao Te messed up the rhythm, and he shouldn't have opened an order these days. The pressure of a large number of people is indeed a bit big, but I don't think there is a mistake in the operation of the stop loss a few times, because I have turned over even if I have a pullback of 80% before, leaving Qingshan in. It's a pity that I didn't encounter a big market to take you flying. If Lao Teh didn't make trouble yesterday, a wave of air in the morning would be a big market, and a wave of more than a wave in the evening would also be a big market. The next meeting is on the 5.2nd, take a break...

The news drops, a record that echoes in the crypto world: 1 Zettahash per second. A figure that, at first glance, lights up the eyes of enthusiasts. But behind this prodigious rise in hashrate, more complex questions lie for miners. A technical feat that does not encompass, far from it, all the economic dynamics of the network. Because while Bitcoin’s hashrate climbs, that does not guarantee profitability. And in the shadow of this record, some already fear the price to pay to remain competitive. After the new historical peak in February , the Bitcoin network crossed an historic milestone on April 5, 2025, reaching a hashrate of 1 Zettahash per second. This spectacular ascent is the result of a decade of technological progress in the mining universe. Just two months ago, Bitcoin was already recording a record of 0.845 ZH/s, a performance whose significance seemed more symbolic than operational. But with this threshold crossed, the network becomes more powerful and more secure, thanks to an increasingly fierce competition among miners. Big names in mining like MARA Holdings, Riot Platforms, and Core Scientific are now racing with cutting-edge machines, claiming that this performance strengthens the network’s resistance to attacks. Miners who can calculate blocks more quickly contribute, indirectly, to the system’s security. Yet behind this technical feat lies a harsher reality: the profitability of miners remains a puzzle. Despite the power deployed, the price of Bitcoin is dropping, and margins are tightening. Currently at $77,000, the price of Bitcoin has fallen by 7.7% in 24 hours, putting additional pressure on miners who see their operating costs rise without being able to compensate for the price drop. The events of September 2023 remain etched in memories: despite a record hashrate, miners’ profitability collapsed. Rising electricity costs, more expensive equipment, and low Bitcoin prices have failed to maintain profitability, a paradox now familiar in the sector. High-end machines may seem efficient, but without a high BTC price, they are just a costly investment. The increase in hashrate is accompanied by a concentration of mining power in the hands of a few major pools, such as Foundry USA and AntPool. While this concentration enhances network security, it also raises a question of decentralization. As equipment becomes more powerful, it gets more expensive, and only the largest market players can keep up this frantic race. Moreover, high mining volumes are not a guarantee of success for everyone. While the big players capture the majority of the hashrate, small miners struggle to keep up, and many of them risk not covering their costs. The business model of mining is therefore becoming increasingly difficult to maintain. Profitability depends more than ever on managing fixed costs, machine efficiency, and of course, the price of Bitcoin. Some key points to remember: If Bitcoin reaches 1 Zettahash, this performance shows that the network is becoming increasingly robust and resilient. However, a hashrate record does not necessarily equate to profitability . The example from last September, where a record hashrate was not enough to save miners, shows that the economic dynamics of the network remain complex and fragile. If miners want to ensure their profitability, they must adapt to a reality where increasing computing power is just a lever, without a guarantee of success if the price of Bitcoin does not follow.