Preço de SIXSIX

Pi Network (PI) has been trapped in the wider crypto market bearish outlook. The mid-cap altcoin, with a fully diluted valuation of about $7.5 billion and a 24-hour average traded volume of about $196 million, has dropped over 68 percent in the past four weeks to trade about $0.723 on Monday, March 31, during the early Western financial markets. Pi Team Encounters Major Headwinds The Pi team has struggled to keep the network vibrant following the hyped token generation event and the notable pushback from top-tier centralized exchanges, led by Bybit. The Pi team has attempted to publish several network network updates, but none has stirred bullish momentum to date. Late last week, the Pi team announced an update on mainnet migration and account verification. The Pi team announced that it has shifted from relying primarily on phone numbers to using email-based two-factor authentication (2FA) verification. What Next? Since hitting its all-time high (ATH), of about $2.99 on February 26, Pi price has been trapped in a falling trend, characterized by lower lows and lower highs in the 4-hour and daily timeframes. From a technical analysis standpoint, PI price is currently retesting the last major support level of around 72 cents. A consistent breach of the current support level will result in a renewed selloff in the coming weeks. A potential rebound from the current support level will kickstart a fresh bull rally toward a new ATH. However, the accelerated PI coin selloff, by the early adopters in the past six years, has heavily weighed down on possible bullish sentiment in the near term.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has introduced a new roadmap intended to improve the security and finality of Ethereum’s Layer 2 (L2) rollup solutions. This proposal seeks to address current challenges related to achieving both high scalability and user trust within the broader Ethereum ecosystem. The core plan centers on using a novel “2-of-3 proof system.” This approach combines three distinct types of transaction validation mechanisms simultaneously. These mechanisms would include zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs, standard optimistic proofs, and proofs generated within trusted execution environments (TEEs). ZK proofs provide a cryptographic assurance of transaction validity without revealing underlying data. Optimistic proofs, conversely, assume submitted L2 transactions are valid by default but incorporate a challenge period allowing independent verifiers to dispute potentially fraudulent activities. TEEs utilize specialized secure hardware enclaves to execute code privately and safely, offering another form of verification. Within this proposed multi-proof system, L2 transactions would achieve finality on Ethereum only when at least two of these three different proof mechanisms concur on the outcome. This design reduces reliance on any single proof system’s security assumptions and theoretically enhances overall rollup security guarantees for users. Related: Vitalik Buterin: Fund “Valuable” Open Source Projects, Not Just “Public Goods” Buterin’s roadmap outlines criteria for advancing to Stage 2 rollups, where the goal is to provide near-instant transaction confirmations, high finality, and strong failure resistance, even in semi-trusted environments. Per the proposal, Stage 2 rollups would still adhere to Ethereum’s standard 30-day upgrade delay mechanism. This delay helps maintain overall network stability and security during major software transitions. In addition, the plan addresses Ethereum’s scaling challenges, with upgrades like Pectra and Fusaka set to increase data availability, potentially enabling rollups to handle up to 72 blobs for faster, cheaper transactions. As Ethereum’s L2 solutions mature, achieving faster finality and increased trust is of utmost importance for scalability and user confidence. As such, Buterin’s proposed strategy would increase security but also align with Ethereum’s commitment to decentralization and trust minimization. Furthermore, Buterin advocates for a shift from public goods funding to open-source funding within the crypto community. He argues that the term ‘public good’ is susceptible to social biases, often prioritizing perception over actual impact. Buterin believes that by focusing on open-source funding, the emphasis shifts to transparency and supporting projects that deliver tangible benefits to the ecosystem. Related: Vitalik Buterin’s Six-Month Roadmap for Ethereum: Faster, Fairer, and With AI All things considered, this could be great news for Ethereum as its infrastructure would be strengthened and the transaction efficiency would get a boost. Also, if this turns out to be a big success, it will likely promote sustainable development practices within the blockchain community. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

On the eve of what U.S. President Donald Trump has called “liberation day,” the price of gold reached a new milestone of $3,117 per ounce. This came just days after the precious metal surpassed the $3,100 mark, fueling optimism among gold proponents. Gold’s attractiveness amid trade war fears, which have weighed on traditional assets and even bitcoin ( BTC), has prompted Goldman Sachs to revise its year-end price prediction upward. As reported by Reuters, the investment bank raised its forecast range to $3,250-$3,520 from $3,100-$3,300. Goldman Sachs attributes the change to aggressive gold purchases by Asian central banks, a trend it expects to continue for the next three to six years. It also cites stronger-than-expected gold exchange-traded fund (ETF) inflows as another reason for the upward revision. The apparent change in investors’ stance on gold contrasts with their perception of BTC, particularly after Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20. While gold’s latest milestone brings its year-to-date gain to 22%, BTC’s slide from its Trump inauguration day peak of nearly $109,000 to just under $83,000 on March 31 means it ended the first quarter of 2025 approximately 23% in the red. This Q1 performance by digital assets, seen by some as a safe-haven asset, has emboldened critics who reject the notion that BTC is digital gold. The fact that BTC has seemingly wavered each time Trump has threatened or imposed tariffs on the U.S.’s main trade partners lends credence to their argument. However, despite this seeming correlation with traditional assets, bitcoin proponents insist the crypto asset’s first-quarter performance does not undermine its digital gold status. This sentiment is shared by experts interviewed by Bitcoin.com News, including Rena Shah, COO of Trust Machines. According to Shah, while gold might have retained its safe-haven status, Bitcoin is the “only asset you’ll never sell.” The COO also pointed to how BTC continues to outperform other assets since the launch of bitcoin ETFs. “Bitcoin is punching above its weight, as a younger asset class compared to legacy ETFs, like gold. Whether you hold bitcoin as a hedge against market uncertainty or are waiting for the right reentry point, Bitcoin is evolving to offer so much more than gold can,” Shah said. Ben Caselin, CMO at African cryptocurrency exchange VALR, said the prospect of countries and central banks adding BTC to their treasuries signals the start of a country-level game theory. Caselin also cites countries stocking up on gold as indicating better times ahead for BTC. “We cannot rule out that these movements are due to game theory around Bitcoin, with the rally in gold acting as a precursor for an explosion in bitcoin acquisition,” Caselin said. Mithil Thakore, CEO of Velar, told Bitcoin.com News that he disagrees with the notion that Bitcoin has lost its digital gold status. Instead, he argued that BTC has become “more important than ever, both in terms of perception and practical adoption.” To support this viewpoint, Thakore pointed to the adoption of BTC by institutions and its proven staying power. Regarding what the rising interest in gold means for BTC, the Velar CEO said: “Renewed interest in gold actually supports Bitcoin’s value proposition. Both assets are responding to macroeconomic instability, inflation concerns, and growing distrust in fiat systems.” Luke Xie, co-founder and CEO of Satlayer, suggested that gold’s rally could be temporary, fueled by “short-term safe-haven inflows amid global uncertainty.” This contrasts with BTC, whose value proposition is “anchored in its finite supply, decentralized network, and ever-growing adoption.” Xie also highlighted how bitcoin’s gold status is boosted by technological advancements, something that cannot be said of gold. “In essence, rather than losing its ‘digital gold’ status, Bitcoin is evolving—bolstered by technological advancements and strategic initiatives like BTCfi—that underscore its complementary and superior role in modern portfolio construction,” the Satlayer CEO said. 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

I have navigated through multiple market cycles in the digital asset space—most were driven by narratives and authentic technological advancements. Only a few changed the game entirely. In the last six months, it has become clear to me that the intersection of AI Agents and Web3 has the potential to encompass both elements, but only if the sector can move past early speculation and build for long-term value for end users. We’ve seen this story before. In 2017, the ICO boom outpaced any meaningful product development. In 2021, NFTs exploded into the mainstream before many platforms had even built the underlying infrastructure for creators and collectors. In 2017, the ICO boom outpaced any meaningful product development. In both cases, the correction was as swift as the rise. And in both cases, the correction was as swift as the rise. The recent explosion of AI Agent tokens followed a similar arc. Dozens of projects launched under the banner of “Crypto + AI”, attracting large inflows of capital and attention. Some achieved billion-dollar valuations within weeks. But as with past cycles, speculative capital alone does not create sustainable ecosystems. As investor enthusiasm cooled, so did user engagement—and most early token economies have struggled to retain relevance. Yet amid that volatility, something changed. In Q4 2024, Deepseek introduced a technical breakthrough that caught the attention of our team at HTX Ventures: a large-scale model trained entirely through reinforcement learning, with no reliance on human-labeled data. In practical terms, this dramatically reduces the cost of developing autonomous, intelligent agents. For the first time, it became feasible to deploy AI agents across Web3 with scalability and adaptability without the prohibitive infrastructure typically associated with AI development. This shift matters. If crypto is to fulfill its promise as a decentralized, permissionless, and programmable financial layer, then agents capable of autonomous decision-making will become essential infrastructure. And yet, we are still some way from that vision. What concerns me is that we are once again at risk of mistaking momentum for maturity. A handful of promising frameworks—like Eliza—are beginning to offer composable agent tooling across Ethereum, Solana, and TON. Launchpads such as Virtual and Clanker have helped accelerate token distribution. Application-level products like GRIFFAIN and NEUR are experimenting with AI-driven asset management and governance tools. But these remain early signals, not proven systems. Too many AI Agent projects are still designed for speculation, not sustainability. And if that continues, we will face another cycle of capital flight, unmet expectations, and delayed progress. That would be a missed opportunity. Because the use cases are real. Defi strategies that are too complex for most users could be simplified through autonomous portfolio managers. Governance systems could be enhanced by agents that parse proposals, evaluate precedent, and vote based on user-defined values. And cross-chain automation could become seamless through agents acting on user intent. In each of these cases, the need is not hypothetical—it is already here. What’s missing is consistent execution, user retention, and functional token economics. So where do we go from here? First, we must hold AI Agent projects to the same level of scrutiny we apply to DeFi and infrastructure protocols. That starts with moving beyond vague narratives to rigorous project frameworks—asking difficult but essential questions such as: Protocols must demonstrate not only technical potential, but also real-world usage, sustainable revenue models, and measurable impact. This is the difference between a proof of concept and a protocol worth building on. Second, on top of applications, the industry needs to provide a solid infrastructure that enables the success of AI Agents on-chain, this includes Agent frameworks, data layers, computational infrastructures and more. HTX Ventures will keep a close eye on these fundamental developments because some parts from this space will become as important as EVM compatibility became for L1s in 2020. And finally, we need to foster a culture that prioritizes iteration and transparency. Not every project will get it right on the first attempt. But those that do will likely define the next frontier of Web3. The convergence of AI and crypto is not a novelty. It is a necessary evolution. But if we are to seize this moment, the industry must focus less on capturing attention and more on delivering value. This isn’t just a thesis for HTX Ventures. It’s a conviction grounded in past lessons and future potential. We have the tools. We have the builders. What we need now is discipline. 免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Overview KiloEx is a decentralized exchange platform designed to offer traders rapid transactions, real-time market tracking, and an intuitive trading experience. It also provides liquidity providers with risk-neutral positions and LP-friendly solutions. The platform's native token is KILO. Tokenomics Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 KILO Circulating Supply: 211,700,000 KILO Market Capitalization: Approximately $17.44 million 24-Hour Trading Volume: Around $33.87 million Current Price: Approximately $0.0824 per KILO (Note: These figures are as of April 1, 2025, and are subject to change due to market fluctuations.) Trading Platforms KILO tokens can be traded on several centralized crypto exchanges, including: LBank: Most active trading pair is KILO/USDT. Bitget: Offers KILO/USDT trading pair. Bybit: Provides KILO/USDT trading pair. Unique Features KiloEx introduces $xKILO, an illiquid and non-transferable token that can be minted 1:1 with KILO tokens. Users can stake $xKILO to earn rewards in both $xKILO and USDT. The redemption process for converting $xKILO back to KILO allows users to choose the percentage and duration, ranging from 50% over 15 days to 100% over six months. KiloCoin (KLC) Overview KiloCoin (KLC) is a peer-to-peer, proof-of-work cryptocurrency that was launched in 2014 by Kilocoin, Inc. It was designed to serve as a new measurement of value in the digital currency space. KiloCoin is an open-source project developed under the MIT/X11 license and operates without a central authority. Technical Specifications Algorithm: Scrypt (similar to Litecoin) Total Supply: 10,025,186,872 KLC Inflation Policy: Maximum of 10% per year over ten years Market Performance As of April 1, 2025, KiloCoin has a total supply of 10.02 billion KLC. However, detailed market data such as current price, market capitalization, and trading volume are not readily available, indicating limited trading activity and adoption. Distinguishing Factors KiloCoin differentiates itself from other cryptocurrencies by: Utilizing the scrypt hashing algorithm, making it resistant to SHA-256 mining hardware. Positioning itself as the "electronic copper" in the cryptocurrency hierarchy, complementing Bitcoin's "gold" and Litecoin's "silver" statuses. Conclusion Both KiloEx (KILO) and KiloCoin (KLC) represent unique approaches within the cryptocurrency landscape. KiloEx focuses on enhancing the decentralized trading experience with innovative features for traders and liquidity providers. In contrast, KiloCoin aims to establish itself as a new standard of value with its distinct technical attributes. Potential investors and users should conduct thorough research and consider market dynamics before engaging with either cryptocurrency.$KILO