Preço de Orderly NetworkORDER

$PARTI can someone help me with a query ? can i place an order in advance to purchase parti coins. what is the procedure to do so? and will order be executed automatically ?

Most people think they need to own 10, 20, or even 50 different coins to make it in crypto. They spend their days jumping from one project to another, hoping to catch the next big pump. But the truth is, you only need ONE coin to break free from financial struggles. The Biggest Mistake in Crypto A lot of people fail in crypto, not because they don’t invest, but because they don’t commit. They hop from one token to another, always looking for the "next Bitcoin." They buy high, panic-sell when the price drops, then repeat the cycle. This isn’t investing—this is gambling. Think about it: The biggest winners in Bitcoin didn’t sell after a 2x or 5x gain. They held through the ups and downs. The early adopters of Ethereum didn’t dump at $10, they waited for the long-term vision to play out. Solana believers didn’t abandon ship when it crashed in the last bear market—they accumulated more. Crypto rewards patience and conviction, but most people don’t have either. Why You Only Need One Coin Imagine if you had put $1,000 into Bitcoin when it was under $100. You’d have millions today. But most people would have sold at $500, thinking they made a great profit. The same thing happens every cycle—people get distracted by short-term gains and miss out on the real wealth-building opportunity. The truth is, you don’t need to spread yourself thin. One coin, chosen wisely, can change your life. Here’s why focusing on one strong project is powerful: ✅ You understand it deeply – Instead of guessing, you actually know why you’re invested. ✅ You build conviction – When prices dip, you won’t panic-sell because you believe in its future. ✅ You maximize gains – Spreading your money across 20 coins means you’ll never see massive returns. One good investment beats 20 bad ones. ✅ You avoid stress – Instead of constantly checking 10 charts, you can focus on your one big bet. The Formula for Success Instead of jumping on every new trend, follow this simple strategy: 1️⃣ Find a Coin with Strong Fundamentals – It should have real-world utility, a solid team, and strong community support. 2️⃣ Accumulate Consistently – Stop trying to time the market. Buy regularly, especially during dips. 3️⃣ Ignore the Noise – People will tell you to sell. They’ll call it a scam. Stay focused. 4️⃣ Hold Long Enough for the Magic to Happen – Wealth isn’t made in weeks, it’s made in years. The Harsh Reality: Most People Will Quit The sad truth is, most people won’t make life-changing money in crypto. Not because they picked the wrong coin, but because they gave up too soon. The market will shake you out with: 🚨 Sudden crashes 🚨 Negative news 🚨 Fear and doubt But the people who win in crypto are the ones who stay the course. One coin. One opportunity. One decision that could change your life. The question is: Do you have the patience to see it through? $BTC $MUBARAK $BROCCOLI $PEPE $ETH $NEIROETH $ORDER $FORM $XRP $SOL

SUI Breakout Incoming? Bulls Eye Key Levels! Sui ($SUI) is currently trading at $2.4191, up +4.75%, showing renewed bullish momentum. The price recently tested $2.4505 but faced slight resistance. 📊 Key Levels to Watch: Resistance: $2.4505 – A break above this could trigger a move toward $2.50+ Support: $2.2600 – Holding above this level keeps bullish momentum intact 📈 Market Overview: 24h Volume: 8.22M SUI 7-day Performance: +5.90% 180-day Growth: +47.52% Potential Trade Setup: Bullish Breakout: Entry above $2.45, targeting $2.50 – $2.55 Bearish Scenario: Losing $2.26 could lead to a retest of $2.20 With ETF rumors circulating and increased buy-side pressure (73% buying in order book), SUI could be gearing up for another leg up. Keep an eye on volume confirmation!

The $PI /USDT pair is currently trading at $0.9376, reflecting a 0.11% decline in the last hour. Despite recent volatility, where PI saw a 24-hour high of $0.9992 and a low of $0.9088, the price remains in a consolidation phase. Market Overview & Trends 📉 Short-Term Weakness: PI has experienced a -0.50% drop today, extending its weekly decline to -17.99% and its monthly losses to -39.21%. 📊 Technical Indicators: Moving Averages: The 5-period MA ($0.9391) and 10-period MA ($0.9354) are trending below the 20-period MA ($0.9411), signaling near-term resistance. Order Book Sentiment: Buyers hold a 58% dominance, indicating potential support at this level. Key Levels to Watch Support: $0.9088 (24h low) Resistance: $0.9992 (24h high) With Pi Network’s Open Network transition still unfolding, traders should monitor price action for a potential breakout or further downside risks. A strong break above $1.00 could shift momentum bullish, while a loss of support at $0.90 might invite further selling pressure.

In a stunning revelation that adds political intrigue to an already high-profile legal battle, Reuters has uncovered that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) interim chief, Mark Uyeda, cast the sole dissenting vote against suing Elon Musk earlier this year. The closed-door vote, held just days before Republicans took control of the agency in January, approved a lawsuit over Musk’s delayed disclosure of Twitter stock purchases. The 4-1 decision not only highlights deep internal divisions within the SEC but also raises serious questions about political pressure, regulatory integrity, and the future of enforcement under a Musk-friendly administration. In a quiet but consequential January vote, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) decided 4-1 to sue Elon Musk over his delayed disclosure of Twitter shares. The vote, revealed exclusively by Reuters , exposed a deep rift within the agency. The lone dissenter? Republican Commissioner Mark Uyeda, now the SEC’s interim chief. His "no" vote came just days before a political shift in Washington saw Republicans take control of the agency. The core issue stems from Musk’s 2022 acquisition of Twitter (now X), when he disclosed his stake 21 days late—far beyond the required 10-day window for holdings exceeding 5%. That delay, the SEC argues, allowed him to scoop up more shares at lower prices, saving him $150 million and triggering market movements. The agency sued Musk on January 14, just a week after the commissioners' internal vote. Uyeda, a Republican appointee and close observer of political implications, reportedly questioned the motives behind the lawsuit. Before the vote, he asked SEC enforcement staff to sign pledges that the case was free from political influence—an unusual move rejected by the staff. His opposition was not necessarily about Musk’s actions, but about the optics and timing of the enforcement, which came just before a change in administration. The timing has raised eyebrows. Musk is a known ally of President Donald Trump, and the vote occurred just before Republican leadership took over the SEC. Trump has since issued an executive order accusing the SEC of partisan targeting under Biden and demanded a review of politically driven investigations. Though the SEC declined to comment, the lawsuit’s proximity to the power shift casts doubt on the agency’s neutrality in the eyes of critics. The commission reportedly demanded Musk give up the $150 million in alleged gains and pay an additional penalty. While Uyeda voted no, fellow Republican Hester Peirce sided with the three Democratic commissioners, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. The decision shows an unusual split within Republican ranks and underscores the internal friction over how to deal with the billionaire entrepreneur. Intent was key. SEC investigators explored whether Musk knowingly delayed the filing—a charge that could carry more severe consequences. Musk, however, claimed he misunderstood the rule and eventually complied. The SEC dropped the intent angle but still pursued civil penalties. Musk had agreed to be deposed twice but resisted further interviews, delaying the case until after the 2024 election. Legal experts question the SEC’s sluggish pace. A late filing case is typically straightforward. "Bringing it at the last minute—it loses credibility," said Howard Fischer, a former SEC lawyer. Others argue that not filing at all would have looked like selective enforcement, undermining the agency’s role in upholding fair markets. Musk has until April 4 to respond to the court summons. With Uyeda now leading the SEC and Trump ordering a review of the agency’s actions, the Musk case could become a lightning rod in the wider war over regulatory power and political influence. Musk’s long-standing feud with the SEC—dating back to his 2018 Tesla tweet saga—adds more fuel to the fire. The internal divide within the SEC, revealed in this exclusive report, paints a picture of an agency caught between law and politics. Whether the case against Musk is about justice or timing remains an open question—one that could reshape the future of securities enforcement in a deeply divided America.