Preço de GasGAS

$ETH Ethereum's native token, Ether (ETH), has repeatedly entered oversold territory against Bitcoin (BTC) in recent months, yet it has not shown signs of establishing a price bottom. The current trading scenario mirrors a previous pattern, suggesting that ETH's market structure might repeat itself in the second and third quarters of this year. The relative strength index (RSI) for ETH on a three-day timeframe remains below 30, typically indicating a potential price bounce. However, historical trends reveal that previous dips into oversold conditions have not marked a definitive bottom, with each occurrence followed by further declines, indicating persistent bearish momentum. Since mid-2024, the ETH/BTC pair has experienced multiple breakdowns, with losses of approximately 13%, 21%, 25%, and 19.5% in quick succession. Additionally, the 50-day and 200-day exponential moving averages (EMAs) are trending downward, confirming the absence of bullish strength. Market analyst @mianikramullah has pointed out ETH's negative price performance, noting that the ETH/BTC pair has failed to confirm a bullish divergence on its weekly chart, where the price makes lower lows but the RSI makes higher lows. The ongoing ETH/BTC downtrend is notable when compared to the broader crypto market, including persistent outflows from US-based spot ETH ETFs and negative onchain data. Net flows into spot Ether ETFs dropped 9.8% in March to $2.54 billion, while spot Bitcoin ETF net flows decreased by 2.35% to $35.74 billion during the same period. Meanwhile, Ethereum's gas fees, measured by daily median gas consumption on the mainnet, were around 1.12 GWEI as of March, a significant decrease from the previous year. Despite a second rally in ETH prices towards the end of 2024, mainnet activity, as measured by gas consumption, did not fully recover. Data analytics platform noted that much of the activity has shifted to Solana and Layer 2 solutions over 2024. market remains cautiously bearish on ETH due to its unfavorable risk/reward ratio compared to Bitcoin and lower-valued altcoins with niche market focus. The ETH/BTC pair is forming a bear pennant pattern on the daily chart, characterized by consolidation within converging trendlines following a steep decline. A bear pennant typically resolves when the price drops below the lower trendline, potentially leading to a 15% decrease from current levels. The 50-day and 200-day EMAs continue their downward trajectory, with the ETH/BTC pair trading well below these key levels, indicating a persistent bear market structure. Despite the downside risk, a bullish invalidation could occur if ETH/BTC breaks above the pennant's upper resistance and turns the 50-day EMA into support.$BTC

$ETH Ethereum's native token, Ether (ETH), has repeatedly entered oversold territory against Bitcoin (BTC) in recent months, yet it has not shown signs of establishing a price bottom. The current trading scenario mirrors a previous pattern, suggesting that ETH's market structure might repeat itself in the second and third quarters of this year. The relative strength index (RSI) for ETH on a three-day timeframe remains below 30, typically indicating a potential price bounce. However, historical trends reveal that previous dips into oversold conditions have not marked a definitive bottom, with each occurrence followed by further declines, indicating persistent bearish momentum. Since mid-2024, the ETH/BTC pair has experienced multiple breakdowns, with losses of approximately 13%, 21%, 25%, and 19.5% in quick succession. Additionally, the 50-day and 200-day exponential moving averages (EMAs) are trending downward, confirming the absence of bullish strength. Market analyst @mianikramullah has pointed out ETH's negative price performance, noting that the ETH/BTC pair has failed to confirm a bullish divergence on its weekly chart, where the price makes lower lows but the RSI makes higher lows. The ongoing ETH/BTC downtrend is notable when compared to the broader crypto market, including persistent outflows from US-based spot ETH ETFs and negative onchain data. Net flows into spot Ether ETFs dropped 9.8% in March to $2.54 billion, while spot Bitcoin ETF net flows decreased by 2.35% to $35.74 billion during the same period. Meanwhile, Ethereum's gas fees, measured by daily median gas consumption on the mainnet, were around 1.12 GWEI as of March, a significant decrease from the previous year. Despite a second rally in ETH prices towards the end of 2024, mainnet activity, as measured by gas consumption, did not fully recover. Data analytics platform noted that much of the activity has shifted to Solana and Layer 2 solutions over 2024. market remains cautiously bearish on ETH due to its unfavorable risk/reward ratio compared to Bitcoin and lower-valued altcoins with niche market focus. The ETH/BTC pair is forming a bear pennant pattern on the daily chart, characterized by consolidation within converging trendlines following a steep decline. A bear pennant typically resolves when the price drops below the lower trendline, potentially leading to a 15% decrease from current levels. The 50-day and 200-day EMAs continue their downward trajectory, with the ETH/BTC pair trading well below these key levels, indicating a persistent bear market structure. Despite the downside risk, a bullish invalidation could occur if ETH/BTC breaks above the pennant's upper resistance and turns the 50-day EMA into support.$BTC

The world of cryptocurrency is massive. There are many crypto projects that are making technological advancements, collaborating, and introducing new projects to enhance their ecosystem. Today, in this article, we are going to discuss the 3 massive coins that are XRP (XRP), Bitcoin (BTC), and Ethereum (ETH) and will know what XRP is best among them all in terms of investment, technology, and other aspects. Let’s explore these cryptos below! XRP vs. Bitcoin: Why XRP Is Better? XRP (XRP) and Bitcoin (BTC) are the crypto giants serving different purposes. While BTC is often considered a store of value and XRP is considered a fast and efficient space. Below, you’ll explore the comparison of these two cryptos. Transaction & Fees In terms of transaction speed and fees, Bitcoin is slower, as it takes around 10+ minutes to bring fiinality, while XRP only takes 3 to 5 seconds with minimal fees. Scalability Bitcoin has the ability to process 7 transactions per second (TPS), while XRP has 1,500+ TPS ability, offering high scalability. Energy Efficiency The Bitcoin Proof-of-Work (PoW) mechanism uses a lot of computation power, equivalent to the power consumption of a small country, while XRP, due to its unique consensus protocol, is energy-efficient and sustainable. Use Case & Adoption Bitcoin is digital gold because it is a store of value, which makes it not ideal for every transaction. On the other hand, XRP has many real-world utility, is accepted, and collaborates with many financial institutions and banks. Overall, XRP is outperforming Bitcoin in many ways, such as cost-effectiveness, scalability, use cases, energy efficiency, and more. Its increasing collaboration, such as with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and new technological launches like XRPTurbo’s Token Launch, SMM (Secure Market Manager), and its stablecoin launch of RLUSD, shows this project’s commitment to enhancing the system.  XRP vs. Ethereum: Why XRP Is the Better Choice XRP (XRP) and Ethereum (ETH) both stand out as efficient and scalable choices in international transactions. Below is a comparison of these duo giants: 1.   Transaction Speed & Fees Ethereum takes around 15 seconds to a few minutes to complete the transaction with high gas fees, while XRP settles that transaction in just 3-5 seconds with minimal charges. 2.   Scalability The scalability of Ethereum is high compared to Bitcoin but less than that of the XRP. Ethereum can process up to 30 TPS (transactions per second), though Ethereum 2.0 aims to improve this. While XRP has 1,500 + TPS, making it more compatible for the payment. 3.   Energy Efficiency Ethereum runs on Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and has less energy consumption but still has a complex stalking mechanism, while the XRP consensus protocol is more efficient and is less complex, offering sustainability. 4.   Use Case & Adoption Ethereum offers smart contracts, DeFi, and NFTs, but it has network congestion and high gas fees that hinder its wider acceptance. While XRP offers fast, cross-border payment at a cost-effective rate that made it adaptable by several banks, financial services provide it as a payment medium. Overall, XRP has better performance abilities than Ethereum and has more utilities than ETH. Crypto is more affordable and can surge in 2025 due to high adoption and collaboration. Why is XRP the Better Choice? XRP is a better investment option because the XRP Ledger (XRPL) enhances its utility, making it widely adopted by financial institutions. There are several real-world uses of XRP, such as tokenization, NFT minting, on-demand liquidity (ODL), interoperability, and growing enterprise adoption, making XRP position as a transformative force in the digital space.

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US gas prices drop for the fourth consecutive week, reaching a four-year low.

Daniel Wang was not born a successful blockchain entrepreneur, but his journey has been marked by significant leaps from one technology field to the next. Born in Pudongxin, Shanghai, he developed a strong passion in technology from early years. His foundation for leading him to several well-known technology companies came from his additional study at Arizona State University and the University of Science and Technology of China. Following graduation, Wang began his career at Google as a senior software engineer in Mountain View, where he gained knowledge on large-scale technology systems. He then progressed to JD.com, a senior director of engineering overseeing one of China’s biggest e-commerce systems. This encounter helped him to grasp technological efficiency and decentralized systems even more. Still lacking, though, something felt inadequate. Though Wang had a strategic role in a big company, he felt that outside there were more challenges waiting for him. 2014 saw Wang choose to venture outside his comfort zone into the world of cryptocurrency . He started the crypto exchange platform Coinport. The project did not turn out as planned, sadly. Different technical difficulties and the young market compelled him to close the platform. Still, this event was not the end of the earth. Actually, the collapse taught him a lot. One of his main realizations was that users of centralized exchanges lack actual control over their own assets, hence there is a basic flaw in them This turned into the motivation behind Loopring later on. Wang started Loopring in 2017, a system enabling decentralized crypto exchanges atop the Ethereum network. Loopring uses zkRollup technology to enable direct trading from user wallets with reduced costs and faster speeds, unlike traditional crypto exchanges that hold user funds. The concept at the time made many people dubious. Decentralized exchanges were not yet popular, and many doubted whether this fix was truly required. Wang, though, was not discouraged. He thought this approach would affect future crypto asset trading among people. And Loopring has expanded quickly indeed. As adoption of the protocol rises, it has become among the DeFi pioneers. Many traders choose it first since its benefits in lowering gas fees and accelerating transaction speeds appeal to them. Wang announced his leaving from Loopring’s CEO post and shifted to an advisory role early in 2022. Many were taken aback by this choice, but it was quickly clear why. Wang wanted to concentrate on a new project called Taiko Labs . Taiko Labs relies on zero-knowledge proof technology yet seeks to create a more flexible layer 2 for Ethereum. This action reveals Wang’s discontent with a single innovation. He aspires to continue expanding the potential of blockchain technology. On the other hand, the Loopring community has been monitoring Wang’s actions. His personal Ethereum wallet abruptly sent 100 million LRC tokens to Loopring Exchange v2 in August 2023 following more than three months of inactivity. This move has sparked rumors—is this component of a new liquidity plan or is another project under development?