Ripple Set to Replace SWIFT? This New List Sparks Speculation

A recent tweet by crypto influencer Amelie has ignited discussions in the digital asset community regarding Ripple’s potential role in the global financial system.

The tweet , which references a video by financial analyst Paul Barron, suggests that Ripple’s involvement in the Faster Payments Council (FPC) could indicate a move toward replacing SWIFT as the dominant cross-border payments network.

Barron highlights key figures from Ripple linked to the FPC, a body focused on enhancing payment efficiency and innovation. He mentions James Selleck and Ryan Zagonne, both associated with Ripple, appearing in documents related to the Faster Payments Task Force. This revelation has led to renewed speculation about Ripple’s growing influence in shaping the future of financial transactions.

WOW! 💥

IS RIPPLE ABOUT TO REPLACE SWIFT? 🌐

PAUL BARRON EXPLAINS:

IF YOU LOOK IN THE BOARD & THE MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNMENT ENTITY „FASTER PAYMENTS COUNCIL“ RIPPLE IS LISTED THERE! 📝 #XRP 🤝🏼 SWIFT pic.twitter.com/FLsM2WhQw7

— 𝓐𝓶𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓮 (@_Crypto_Barbie) February 21, 2025

Ripple’s Presence in the Faster Payments Council

The Faster Payments Council is a collaborative organization aimed at improving the speed and efficiency of payments in the United States and beyond.

It includes financial institutions, payment providers, and technology companies working together to advance payment solutions. Ripple’s involvement in this initiative suggests that blockchain technology is gaining increased recognition in mainstream financial circles.

Paul Barron emphasizes that Ripple’s inclusion in the FPC is significant because few blockchain-focused companies are in such regulatory and advisory bodies. He notes that Ripple has maintained a longstanding focus on cross-border payments , traditionally dominated by SWIFT.

The presence of Ripple representatives in such influential payment discussions reinforces the idea that the company is positioning itself as a key player in the evolving financial landscape.

Comparisons Between Ripple and SWIFT

SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) has been the backbone of cross-border banking transactions for over four decades. However, its reliance on legacy infrastructure has led to inefficiencies, such as high costs and slow processing times. Ripple, on the other hand, leverages blockchain technology to facilitate near-instant settlements with reduced fees.

Paul Barron argues that Ripple could serve as a modern alternative to SWIFT, offering a more efficient and transparent system for global transactions. He suggests that Ripple’s continued integration into financial frameworks, such as the Faster Payments Council, indicates a growing acceptance of blockchain-based solutions by regulators and industry leaders.

Implications for the Future of Cross-Border Payments

While speculation about Ripple replacing SWIFT is not new, its ongoing collaboration with regulatory and financial organizations strengthens its credibility as a transformative force. The Faster Payments Council’s recognition of Ripple suggests that blockchain technology is increasingly embedded in financial infrastructure.

However, challenges remain. SWIFT continues to maintain strong partnerships with major banks and financial institutions worldwide. Additionally, regulatory scrutiny surrounding digital assets, including Ripple’s ongoing legal challenges , could impact its broader adoption.

Despite these challenges, Ripple’s involvement in the Faster Payments Council demonstrates its increasing influence in shaping the future of payments. As blockchain technology gains more acceptance in traditional financial systems, Ripple’s role in facilitating fast and cost-effective transactions would expand.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.