SBF's lawyer completed the closing argument and insisted on defending SBF not guilty.
SBF's attorney Mark S. Cohen completed his closing argument in court on Wednesday evening local time, requesting the court and jury to find that SBF acted in "good faith" throughout its operation of FTX and Alameda Research, and therefore cannot be found guilty of fraud. In his closing argument, the attorney stated that it was "real-world miscommunications," "mistakes," and "delays" that harmed other members of FTX and Bankman-Fried's crypto empire, not intentional fraud.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Friday charts: The Marvin Minsky moment is here
Have markets been obsessing over the wrong Minsky?

Charles Hoskinson Reveals Exciting Plans for Lace Wallet’s XRP Functionality
In Brief Charles Hoskinson announces XRP functionality for Lace wallet. Integration aims to enhance multi-chain support and user experience. Upcoming NIGHT token distribution includes XRP holders.

Meme project BONK launches Meme coin issuance platform Letsbonk.Fun
Trending news
MoreCrypto prices
More








