Precio de BluefinBLUE

PI/USDT. 1. Calculate the Difference Between Buy and Sell Amounts: Large Orders: Buy: 14.03M Sell: 16.18M Difference: 16.18M - 14.03M = 2.15M (More selling than buying) Medium Orders: Buy: 9.75M Sell: (There's a typo here, it's not a number, but we can't calculate without it. Let's assume it's 10.5M for the sake of analysis. If you have the actual number, please provide it.) Difference: 10.5M - 9.75M = 0.75M (More selling than buying) Small Orders: Buy: 418.5K Sell: 752.6K Difference: 752.6K - 418.5K = 334.1K (More selling than buying) 2. Analyze the Charts and Data: 1d Fund Flow Donut Chart: Red (Sell): The red segments indicate a significant amount of selling pressure. The "Large order sell" (31.95%) and "Small order sell" (27.77%) are substantial. Blue (Buy): The blue segments represent buying. "Medium order buy" (18.70%) and "Simeli occer buy" (0.83%) are present, but the selling clearly outweighs the buying. Overall: The donut chart strongly suggests a bearish sentiment (more people selling than buying) over the past day. 5d Large Order Net Inflow (PI) Bar Chart: Negative Bars: The bars are all negative, indicating a net outflow of funds (more selling than buying) over the last 5 days. Magnitude: The largest negative bar (-44,867,035) suggests a significant sell-off in a particular period. Trend: The consistent negative trend reinforces the bearish sentiment observed in the donut chart. 24h Funds Net Inflow (PI) Line Graph: Fluctuations: The graph shows fluctuations in net inflow, but the overall trend appears to be slightly negative. Spikes: The sharp spikes indicate moments of intense buying or selling activity. Last 24 Hours: The "Last 24 hours" value (910,895.13) is positive, but it's important to note that this is a single point in time and doesn't necessarily contradict the overall bearish trend. 3. Overall Analysis: Dominant Selling Pressure: All three order sizes (large, medium, and small) show more selling than buying, indicating a general bearish sentiment. 5-Day Trend: The 5-day large order net outflow confirms the sustained selling pressure over a longer period. 24-Hour Volatility: While the 24-hour snapshot shows a positive net inflow, the line graph suggests volatility and doesn't negate the overall bearish trend. Potential Reasons for Selling: There could be various reasons for the increased selling, such as negative news, profit-taking after a price rise, or concerns about the overall market. disclaimer : don't agree with me do your investment at your own research and risk.

$LTC liquidity stacking on both ends Market makers loading their bags before the real move Break above $94.6 and it’s liftoff - dive into the blue zone and things get spicy

$BTC | EDUCATION TRADE BREAKDOWN: Protected High: A key high that the price failed to break. This indicates a strong resistance or a level where significant selling pressure exists. Liquidity Pool: The chart marks areas where liquidity accumulates, making the area best for price manipulation. 1H SCOB (1-Hour Single Candle Order Block): An order block refers to the last bullish or bearish candle before a significant move. This is a key level where big order flow is noticed. Inverse Fair Value Gap (FVG): The shaded blue region represents iFVG. It occurs when there is a gap between candlesticks, indicating an imbalance in price. it got inversed. Entry and Exit: The chart suggests using the FVG, order block (OB), or imbalance for entry. The exit is planned at a lower liquidity area (Asian lows)

Wtf even is this, and why does it make @JoshMandell6's $444,000 Bitcoin prediction look less crazy? It's been widely observed that Bitcoin's price growth over the last 15 years follows a power curve--something like y=ax^b--which differs from other common functions, such as linear (y=ax) or exponential (y=ab^x). When the relationship between variables is fundamental (e.g., gravitational force F=Gm₁m₂/r²), we often call it a "power law." I'll leave it up to you to decide if this long-term trend qualifies as a "law," but regardless, I find value in the fit due to its longevity. Long-term fits in U.S. dollars are skewed by the changing value of the dollar—see "inflation." One way to adjust for this is to measure an asset’s value relative to an inflation-resistant asset, like the price of an ounce of gold. The idea is that gold’s price should rise to offset the dollar’s decreasing value. Here, I’m measuring the value of the Bitcoin network (market cap) in gold ounces and fitting that value to a power curve. On a log-log plot, a power curve appears as a straight line—see the top left subplot. My preference is to fit the lower values using a 0.05 quantile regression and treat that as a "support" trendline. The white line (upper left plot) is the power curve fit of Bitcoin’s market cap in gold ounces. Today’s fit value is 557,039,533 gold ounces. Since we typically value assets in U.S. dollars, it’s convenient to convert that figure. Knowing the current Bitcoin supply and the current price of gold, we can translate those 557M ounces into dollars: 557,039,533 (gold ounces) × $3,040 (dollar value of an ounce of gold) ÷ 19,839,907 (Bitcoin supply) = $85,353 (BTC-USD fit value). If you repeat this process for all past days, you get the squiggly white support line in the subplot on the right. It’s not smooth because gold’s price isn’t smooth. The blue band represents a time shift of the white support line. Simply slide the white support line left by five years. Each white line in the blue band represents a one-year shift. Doing this, we see that the peak at the end of 2017 (~$20,000) touches the "five years ahead" line. Five years later (end of 2022), the white support line equals ~$20,000. Not every peak reaches five years ahead, but we did once, so maybe we could again. So, what’s the connection to Josh? Coincidentally—if you believe in such things—Josh predicted Bitcoin would hit $84,000 a few days ago (which it did) and followed up with a price prediction of $444,000. That sounds crazy, and it is, but it’s also surprisingly close to the "five years ahead" value shown here ($462,557). Since this fit is relative to gold’s price, gold’s rise from $2,000 (2023) to $3,000 (2025) is pushing the values in the right subplot higher. If Bitcoin’s network value measured in gold continues to follow a power curve, and gold holds its current value, and Bitcoin’s price returns to "five years ahead of support," we could hit Josh’s $444K this year. That’s a lot of "ifs," but it’s fun, and I want to believe.

ONDO/USDT: 🚨Accumulation Almost Over? Big Move Coming!🚀 ONDO Bulls Are Waking Up – Next Stop, The Moon? 💎 ONDO is Still Cheap – But For How Long? ONDO/USDT is stuck in an accumulation phase, trading around $0.83, moving sideways with no clear trend for now. But don’t let this fool you – this kind of price action often leads to strong breakouts when volume kicks in! 🔥 —💥What’s the key level to watch? The main resistance sits at $0.93 (FVG 1H). If we get enough buying pressure and price closes above this zone, it could skyrocket toward $1+ in no time. But if ONDO fails to break through, we might see more chop in this range. —📈RSI & Volume Insights: Right now, the RSI indicator is recovering from a low, which means buyers are slowly stepping in. However, the chart still has multiple bearish rejections in past attempts, so a strong push is needed. The 200 MA (blue line) is also above the price, which means bulls still got work to do. —🚨Remember: 🚨 —ONDO is at a make-or-break level. If volume surges and we get that breakout above $0.93, this thing could fly 🚀. But if resistance holds, we might see more sideways movement. Keep an eye on it! $ONDO #ONDO #CryptoTrading #Altcoins #BuyTheDip #CryptoMarket #CryptoNews Follow and like for more. thanks