Precio de HappyFansHAPPY

Don't Missed Blastup Now🚀 Ideal Buying Opportunity 💵 just like hivp holdcoin happy sald ivpay geek blastup wat zzz dapp vext aca ppt mch btc eth Duko 🤑

Blastup is Low Cap Gem coin 🚀 Buy Now Fast just like hivp holdcoin happy sald ivpay geek blastup wat zzz dapp vext aca ppt mch btc eth Duko 🤑

so happy

i have 3 years pi lock up which give me boost rate more than 500%. happy i start mining from when the project start. got tonns of free pi.

Pro-XRP attorney John Deaton has dismissed criticism that claims that XRP “is a centrally controlled security.” Deaton’s pushback came in response to Jason Calacanis, a crypto commentator, who asserted XRP shouldn’t get the same treatment as Bitcoin. Calacanis claimed that securities laws would become meaningless if the SEC allowed XRP to trade freely. He warned that startups and funds could take advantage of this by offloading large token supplies onto retail investors while keeping control over the majority. Calacanis doubled down, suggesting XRP should only be for savvy investors who truly grasp the potential downsides. Deaton, who famously challenged the SEC’s stance against XRP and won, dismissed Calacanis’s concerns. Showing his legal chops, Deaton pointed out that a federal judge appointed by former President Barack Obama cited his legal efforts in the ruling 2023 that favored XRP. Adding a bit of playful challenge, Deaton mentioned he’d be happy to school Calacanis on securities law, should he be interested. “But he may prefer to issue [FUD] statements like this one, unchallenged, to further promote potential bias,” Deaton said. The debate over XRP’s classification has expanded beyond the SEC case, with new discussions emerging around the FIT21 Bill, a proposed regulatory framework for digital assets. Crypto analyst MoneyGCC raised concerns about whether XRP meets the decentralization standards required for commodity classification. According to MoneyGCC, 70% of XRPL’s UNL validators receive funding directly or indirectly from Ripple Labs. At the same time, the company controls over 40% of the token supply. These facts, MoneyGCC argued, make you wonder if XRP can truly be called a commodity under the law. In response, another commentator, “Straightup,” defended XRP’s decentralization, stating that Ripple does not control the XRP Ledger. The individual pointed out that validators operate independently and that the UNL list is customizable. Related: XRP Not a Security: Ripple Celebrates Landmark Ruling, Warns of SEC Overreach Furthermore, Straightup emphasized that XRP’s supply is controlled through an escrow mechanism, preventing Ripple from manipulating the market. He referenced Ethereum’s pre-mined ICO and the SEC’s legal loss against XRP in secondary markets as precedents supporting XRP’s commodity classification. This whole back-and-forth underlines the bigger mess of crypto regulation. While Bitcoin is widely recognized as a commodity, XRP’s classification has been disputed for years. In 2023, a U.S. court ruled that XRP is not a security. Yet, critics often overlook this fact when attacking XRP. Related: XRP Braces for SEC Meeting—Policy Shift, Appeal Fate & Price Reaction in the Balance The Deaton-Calacanis showdown is a microcosm of the crypto industry’s wider cry for clear, consistent regulations. Many crypto advocates argue that existing securities laws are outdated and poorly suited for digital assets. They call for tailored regulations that balance investor protection with innovation. Under previous leadership, the SEC maintained that many tokens, besides Bitcoin, could qualify as securities. This position has led to multiple lawsuits against crypto companies. However, under new leadership, efforts are ongoing to clarify crypto rules. Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.